Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANDG ARUL MURUGAN, CHIEF ANDG ARUL MURUGAN
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. K.Ramakrishnan Proprietor Krish Toyota, No.74-4, 75-1 Pulipakkam Village, Chengalpattu District - 603 002. Respondent(s)______________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35920 of 2025PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein…
Judgment
W.P.No.35920 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANWP No.35920 of 2025J.Raja RamS/o Jayaraman No.144, Gandhi Salai, No.74, Pulipakkam Village, Chengalpattu Taluk - 603002 Chengalpattu District. Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District Collector District Collectorate, Chengalpattu District.
The Project Director No.41/8A, 2/285 S, 2nd Floor, Velchery-Tambaram Main Road, Santhosapuram, Medavakkam Chengalpattu District - 600073.
Operative part
K.Ramakrishnan Proprietor Krish Toyota, No.74-4, 75-1 Pulipakkam Village, Chengalpattu District - 603 002. Respondent(s)______________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35920 of 2025PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent herein to take action upon the 3rd respondent for uprooting the Kattuva Tree from the land in Survey No.82 at Pulipakkam Village, Chengalpattu taluk and district on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 31.08.2025 made to the 2nd respondent by email. For Petitioner(s):Mr.G.MageshkumarFor Respondent(s):Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath, Government Advocate for R1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)The prayer made in this writ petition is to direct the second respondent to take action against the third respondent for uprooting the Kattuva Tree from the land in Survey No.82 at Pulipakkam Village, Chengalpattu Taluk and District, on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 31.08.2025 made to the second respondent by email.2. The matter is not of such a magnitude that the writ court should take cognizance of the issue. ______________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35920 of 20253. The authorities shall look into the complaint and take appropriate action, if so required. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 23.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NosasiTo:1. The District Collector District Collectorate, Chengalpattu District.2. The Project Director No.41/8A, 2/285 S, 2nd Floor, Velchery-Tambaram Main Road, Santhosapuram, Medavakkam Chengalpattu District - 600073.______________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35920 of 2025THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J.(sasi) WP No.35920 of 2025 23.09.2025______________Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.