✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

N SENTHILKUMARCOM

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Accordingly, this Company Application is allowed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

COMP.A No.238 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMARCOMP.A No. 238 of 2025inCP No.209 of 2003 The Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras as the Liquidator of M/s.Dyna Lamps and Glass Works Limited (in liquidation)Corporate Bhavan, II nd Floor, No.29, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. Appellant(s)VsNilRespondent(s)PRAYER: This application has been filed under Section 460 of the Companies Act 1956 read with rules 9, 11(b) of the Companies Court Rules 1959 (a) To take this report on record. (b) To permit the Official Liquidator to accept the lowest quotation received from M/s.Beema Groups and to issue the work order to M/s.Beema Groups, JCB operator, Gummidipoondi. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis COMP.A No.238 of 2025 For Applicant: Ms.B.Ambili, Deputy Official LiquidatorORDERThis company application has been filed seeking the following prayer: (i) To take this report on record. (ii) To permit the Official Liquidator to accept the lowest quotation received from M/s.Beema Groups and to issue the work order to M/s.Beema Groups, JCB operator, Gummidipoondi.2. Ms.B.Ambili, learned Deputy Official Liquidator for the applicant has filed a report and stated that the Office of the Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras has addressed a letter to Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiurvallur to accord necessary permission to remove the bushes, trees etc., which are grown up from the landed property of the Company in liquidation at Peruvoyal Village, Gummidipoondi. Thereafter, the Office of the Official Liquidator received the lowest quotation from M/s.Beema Groups. Therefore, seeks permission of this Court to issue the work order to M/s.Beema Groups, JCB operator, Gummidipoondi. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis COMP.A No.238 of 20253. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned Deputy Official Liquidator and upon perusing the report of the Official Liquidator, this Court is inclined to allow the application as prayed for.4. Accordingly, this Company Application is allowed.19-09-2025JdIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: YesNeutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis COMP.A No.238 of 2025N.SENTHILKUMAR J.jdCOMP.A No. 238 of 2025inCP No.209 of 200319-09-2025

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Company Application is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013 — s. 460.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments