High Court · 2024

W.P.No.35776 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.12.2024CORAM THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P.No.35776 of 2024andW.M.P.No.38646 of 2024Mr.I.Kanniah,Represented by his registered Power Agent,Mr.Ajmir Khan,No.5/1128-23, Pandian Nagar,Yagappa Nagar Extension,Madurai.... Petitioner Vs.1. The District Registrar (South) Chennai, District Registrar's Office, Integrated Building Offices of the Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fanepat, Nandanam, Chennai – 35.2. The Sub-Registrar, Velachery Sub Registrar's Office, No:38, 3rd Main Road, Jagannathapuram, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042.3. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Park Town Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Department, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, No:32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600 003. ... Respondents____________Page No. 1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the entry of encumbrance created in CO/Velachery/Book I/17/2024 dated 02.08.2024 by the Sub Registrar Velachery, with respect to the property of the Petitioner bearing Plot No: 1066 in RAM NAGAR LAYOUT, Velachery, measuring 4800 Sq.ft in Sy.Nos:119 and 123 (as per Patta No.19521 – Sy Nos:119/29, 123/56) of Madipakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, presently Chengelpet District. For Petitioner: M/s.K.M.ValsalaFor R1 & R2: M/s.C.Meera Arumugham Additional Government PleaderFor R3: M/s.C.Harsha Raj Additional Government PleaderORDERM/s.C.Meera Arumugham, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the 1st and 2nd Respondents. M/s.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the 3rd Respondents. ____________Page No. 2 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 20242. This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the entry of encumbrance created in CO/Velachery/Book I/17/2024 dated 02.08.2024 by the Sub Registrar Velachery, with respect to the property of the Petitioner bearing Plot No: 1066 in RAM NAGAR LAYOUT, Velachery, measuring 4800 Sq.ft in Sy.Nos:119 and 123 (as per Patta No.19521 – Sy Nos:119/29, 123/56) of Madipakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, presently Chengelpet District. 3. The Petitioner would submit that subject land belong to the Petitioner he having purchased the same under a registered Sale Deed dated 18.04.1963 from K.B.Gopinathan. The Petitioner has registered a Power of Attorney in favour of his power agent Mr.Ajmir Khan, who initiated the present Writ Petition. 4. While the Power Agent was attempting to deal with the property by entering into a Sale Agreement with third parties, he came to know about a few entries in the Encumbrance Certificate which was not made by his Principal. Therefore, he had made a complaint to the District Registrar and IG Registration and a detailed enquiry was conducted into the same. ____________Page No. 3 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024Ultimately, the District Registrar (South) Chennai found that the documents are fake and fraudulent documents and setaside the following documents:- i 26.06.1963Document No:2253 of 1963Sale Deed by K.B.Gopinathan in favour of A.Duraisamy, S/o.Annamalaiii 12.11.2018Doc.No:6827 of 2018General Power of Attorney by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumari (legal heirs of A.Duraisamy) appointing one Mr.Gomez as their Power Agentiii 23.11.2018Doc.No:7010 of 2018Sale Deed by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumari through their Power Agent Gomez in favour of Mr.S.Kailash Ganesh with respect to Plot No:1068iv 10.12.2018Doc.No:7245 of 2018MODT (Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds) by Mr.S.Kailash Ganesh in favour of Canara Bank for a sum of Rs.3 Croresv 27.02.2019Doc.No:2005 of 2019Cancellation of Power of Attorney in the name of Gomez by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumarivi 28.03.2019Doc.No.2041 of 2019Sale Deed by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumari in favour of Latha with respect to the other Plot (Plot No.1066)vii 23.04.2019Doc No:2565 of 2019MODT (Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds) by Latha in favour of Canara Bank for a sum of Rs.3 Crores____________Page No. 4 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 20245. It appears that the 3rd Respondent had directed the revenue recovery proceedings against the property that is subject matter of sale in favour of Latha Proprietor of JS Pharma, which Sale Deed was also found to be bogus one. Though the documents were set aside as bogus document Encumbrance Certificate created on the directions of the 5th Respondent. The Petitioner gave a representation to the 2nd Respondent to cancel the encumbrance which has not been acceded to and therefore, the above Writ Petition has been filed.6. Heard the learned counsel on either side.7. The 5th Respondent has issued directions to create the encumbrance only on the basis that the property in question belongs to the said Latha Proprietor of JS Pharma, however the District Registrar after his enquiry has come to the conclusion that the Sale Deed in favour of Latha Proprietor of JS Pharma is a bogus one and has set aside the same. Once the documents is found to be fraudulent one no rights will flow from the said document. Therefore, the 5th Respondent cannot insist upon making a claim over the property which does not belong to the Assessee. Therefore, the continuance ____________Page No. 5 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024of the entry in the Encumbrance Certificate will cause hardship to the Petitioner and would also run contrary to the findings of the District Registrar that the documents in question are bogus and fraudulent one. 8. Therefore, the Writ Petition is allowed by directing the 2nd Respondent to delete the entry by stating that the encumbrance created by the 5th Respondent was only on the basis of the forged and fraudulent document. The said entry shall be deleted within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02.12.2024 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation :Yes/Norgm____________Page No. 6 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024To1. The District Registrar (South) Chennai, District Registrar's Office, Integrated Building Offices of the Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fanepat, Nandanam, Chennai – 35.2. The Sub-Registrar, Velachery Sub Registrar's Office, No:38, 3rd Main Road, Jagannathapuram, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042.3. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Park Town Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Department, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, No:32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600 003.____________Page No. 7 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024P.T.ASHA, J.rgm W.P.No.35776 of 2024andW.M.P.No.38646 of 202402.12.2024____________Page No. 8 of 8

W.P.No.35776 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.12.2024CORAM THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P.No.35776 of 2024andW.M.P.No.38646 of 2024Mr.I.Kanniah,Represented by his registered Power Agent,Mr.Ajmir Khan,No.5/1128-23, Pandian Nagar,Yagappa Nagar Extension,Madurai.... Petitioner Vs.1. The District Registrar (South) Chennai, District Registrar's Office, Integrated Building Offices of the Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fanepat, Nandanam, Chennai – 35.2. The Sub-Registrar, Velachery Sub Registrar's Office, No:38, 3rd Main Road, Jagannathapuram, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042.3. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Park Town Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Department, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, No:32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600 003. ... Respondents____________Page No. 1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the entry of encumbrance created in CO/Velachery/Book I/17/2024 dated 02.08.2024 by the Sub Registrar Velachery, with respect to the property of the Petitioner bearing Plot No: 1066 in RAM NAGAR LAYOUT, Velachery, measuring 4800 Sq.ft in Sy.Nos:119 and 123 (as per Patta No.19521 – Sy Nos:119/29, 123/56) of Madipakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, presently Chengelpet District. For Petitioner: M/s.K.M.ValsalaFor R1 & R2: M/s.C.Meera Arumugham Additional Government PleaderFor R3: M/s.C.Harsha Raj Additional Government PleaderORDERM/s.C.Meera Arumugham, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the 1st and 2nd Respondents. M/s.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the 3rd Respondents. ____________Page No. 2 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 20242. This Writ Petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the entry of encumbrance created in CO/Velachery/Book I/17/2024 dated 02.08.2024 by the Sub Registrar Velachery, with respect to the property of the Petitioner bearing Plot No: 1066 in RAM NAGAR LAYOUT, Velachery, measuring 4800 Sq.ft in Sy.Nos:119 and 123 (as per Patta No.19521 – Sy Nos:119/29, 123/56) of Madipakkam Village, Sholinganallur Taluk, presently Chengelpet District. 3. The Petitioner would submit that subject land belong to the Petitioner he having purchased the same under a registered Sale Deed dated 18.04.1963 from K.B.Gopinathan. The Petitioner has registered a Power of Attorney in favour of his power agent Mr.Ajmir Khan, who initiated the present Writ Petition. 4. While the Power Agent was attempting to deal with the property by entering into a Sale Agreement with third parties, he came to know about a few entries in the Encumbrance Certificate which was not made by his Principal. Therefore, he had made a complaint to the District Registrar and IG Registration and a detailed enquiry was conducted into the same. ____________Page No. 3 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024Ultimately, the District Registrar (South) Chennai found that the documents are fake and fraudulent documents and setaside the following documents:- i 26.06.1963Document No:2253 of 1963Sale Deed by K.B.Gopinathan in favour of A.Duraisamy, S/o.Annamalaiii 12.11.2018Doc.No:6827 of 2018General Power of Attorney by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumari (legal heirs of A.Duraisamy) appointing one Mr.Gomez as their Power Agentiii 23.11.2018Doc.No:7010 of 2018Sale Deed by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumari through their Power Agent Gomez in favour of Mr.S.Kailash Ganesh with respect to Plot No:1068iv 10.12.2018Doc.No:7245 of 2018MODT (Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds) by Mr.S.Kailash Ganesh in favour of Canara Bank for a sum of Rs.3 Croresv 27.02.2019Doc.No:2005 of 2019Cancellation of Power of Attorney in the name of Gomez by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumarivi 28.03.2019Doc.No.2041 of 2019Sale Deed by Mrs.Shanthi & Mrs.Kumari in favour of Latha with respect to the other Plot (Plot No.1066)vii 23.04.2019Doc No:2565 of 2019MODT (Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds) by Latha in favour of Canara Bank for a sum of Rs.3 Crores____________Page No. 4 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 20245. It appears that the 3rd Respondent had directed the revenue recovery proceedings against the property that is subject matter of sale in favour of Latha Proprietor of JS Pharma, which Sale Deed was also found to be bogus one. Though the documents were set aside as bogus document Encumbrance Certificate created on the directions of the 5th Respondent. The Petitioner gave a representation to the 2nd Respondent to cancel the encumbrance which has not been acceded to and therefore, the above Writ Petition has been filed.6. Heard the learned counsel on either side.7. The 5th Respondent has issued directions to create the encumbrance only on the basis that the property in question belongs to the said Latha Proprietor of JS Pharma, however the District Registrar after his enquiry has come to the conclusion that the Sale Deed in favour of Latha Proprietor of JS Pharma is a bogus one and has set aside the same. Once the documents is found to be fraudulent one no rights will flow from the said document. Therefore, the 5th Respondent cannot insist upon making a claim over the property which does not belong to the Assessee. Therefore, the continuance ____________Page No. 5 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024of the entry in the Encumbrance Certificate will cause hardship to the Petitioner and would also run contrary to the findings of the District Registrar that the documents in question are bogus and fraudulent one. 8. Therefore, the Writ Petition is allowed by directing the 2nd Respondent to delete the entry by stating that the encumbrance created by the 5th Respondent was only on the basis of the forged and fraudulent document. The said entry shall be deleted within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02.12.2024 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation :Yes/Norgm____________Page No. 6 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024To1. The District Registrar (South) Chennai, District Registrar's Office, Integrated Building Offices of the Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fanepat, Nandanam, Chennai – 35.2. The Sub-Registrar, Velachery Sub Registrar's Office, No:38, 3rd Main Road, Jagannathapuram, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042.3. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Park Town Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Department, Integrated Commercial Taxes Building, No:32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai – 600 003.____________Page No. 7 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35776 of 2024P.T.ASHA, J.rgm W.P.No.35776 of 2024andW.M.P.No.38646 of 202402.12.2024____________Page No. 8 of 8