✦ High Court of India · 05 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Mar 2025
Length
1,068 words

Acts & Sections

WP No. 35356 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAMANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKARWP No. 35356 of 2024andW.M.P.No.38236 of 2024T.Keerthi,D/o.Tamilselvan, 2nd Floor, Sathayam Tower, Gandhiji Street, Karmal School Opposite, Karur Byepass Road, Kollampalayam, Erode- 638 002.Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District Collector,Erode, Erode District.2.The Tahsildar,Erode, Erode District.3.The Revenue Tahsildar, Erode, Erode District.1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 2024Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for an issuance of writ of Certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records in O.Mu No. 5885/ 2024 /A1 dated 08.10.2024 passed by the 3rd respondent in accordance with the G.O. (Ms) No.08 of 2021 dated 09.02.2021 by the Government of Tamil Nadu and to quash the same and further to direct the 1st respondent to take appropriate action on the representation dated 30.09.2024 within a prescribed period.For Petitioner(s):Mr.M.KannanFor Respondent(s):Mr.A.SelvendranSpecial Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)The proceedings of the Tahsildar / second respondent dated 08.10.2024, rejecting the application submitted by the petitioner to convert the community from Most Backward Class (Sengunthar) to Scheduled Caste (Adi Dravidar) is sought to be assailed in the present writ proceedings.2.The petitioner states that the marriage between her father and the mother was solemnised in the year 2005. The father of the petitioner belongs to Sengunthar Caste, which is notified as Backward Class Community and the 2 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 2024mother of the petitioner belongs to Adi Dravidar Caste, which is notified as Scheduled Caste Community. The marriage between the father and the mother of the petitioner is intercaste marriage.3.Admittedly, the petitioner obtained a Community Certificate issued by the competent Authority in Certificate No.TN-5201904086333 dated 28.04.2019, stating that the petitioner belongs to Sengunthar Caste i.e., Backward Class Community. The marriage between the father and the mother of the petitioner was dissolved vide judicial order dated 18.04.2013 by the Principal Subordinate Court, Krishnagiri. Thereafter, the petitioner is living with her mother. Thus, a fresh application has been submitted for change of community from Backward Class community to Scheduled Caste community based on the community of the mother of the petitioner. The Tahsildar rejected the application mainly on the ground that the Community Certificate has already been issued to the petitioner. Therefore, it cannot be changed.3 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 20244.The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would mainly contend that the marriage between the mother and the father of the petitioner has been dissolved and therefore the petitioner is entitled to seek fresh Community Certificate based on the mother's community.5.This Court has examined the Government Orders relating to issuance of Community Certificate. More specifically, children born to inter-caste married couple and regarding determination of community, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.477, Social Welfare Department, dated 27.06.1975 and reads as under:GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADUABSTRACTChildren born to inter-caste married couple - Determination of Community - Orders - Issued.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENTG.O.Ms.No.477Dated 27.6.1975.Order:-The Government have been extending certain concessions to the members of Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes from time to time. A question has arisen about the determination of the community of the children born of inter-caste marriages.4 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 20242.The Government after carefully examining the question, direct that the children born of inter-caste marriages, that is marriages-(i)between a person of a Scheduled Tribe and another of a Scheduled Caste or Backward Class or Forward Class;(ii)between a person of a Scheduled Caste and another of a Backward Class or Forward Class; and(iii)between a person of a Backward Class and of a Forward Classshall be considered to belong to either the community of the father or the community of the mother according to the declaration of the parents regarding the way of life in which the children are brought up and that the declaration in respect of one child will apply to all children.(BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR)S.SATYABHAMA,SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.ToThe Director of Backward Classes, Madras - 5.The Director of School Education, Madras - 6.The Director of Collegiate Education, Madras - 6 etc.,/true copy/6.The above Government Order in clear terms reiterates that the way of life in which the children are brought up and the declaration made at the time of obtaining Community Certificate is to be taken into consideration. The 5 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 2024declaration from the parents regarding the way of life, family status are to be furnished. Pertinently, the reservation under the Indian Constitution is meant for deserving people and based on the social status of the family in the society.7.The said principle considered by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.477 has been reiterated in the subsequent G.O. issued in G.O.(MS)No.08, Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes & Minorities Welfare (BCC) Department dated 09.02.2021. Paragraph No.4 of the said Government Order reiterates that based on the declaration of the parent/s, Revenue Authorities are instructed to issue appropriate 'Community Certificates'.8.In the present case, the declaration was already filed by the parents of the petitioner and Backward Class Community Certificate was issued in the year 2019. The said Community Certificate itself was obtained after dissolution of marriage between the father and mother of the petitioner. Therefore, the claim made by the petitioner is unsustabinable and the ground relating to 6 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 2024dissolution of marriage between the parents are unavailable.9.Declaration regarding way of life and family status being paramount importance to assess the community of a person, once the declaration made before the competent Authority become final, it cannot be altered subsequently. The Authorities, therefore, are not empowered to issue Community Certificate changing the community of the persons, who have already obtained Community Certificate based on the declaration. Thus, the claim of the petitioner is stale and unacceptable and this Court do not find any infirmity in respect of the order impugned. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.(S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.) (K.RAJASEKAR J.)05-03-2025vedaIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No7 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35356 of 2024S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR J.vedaTo1.The District CollectorErode, Erode District.2.The TahsildarErode, Erode District.3.The Revenue Tahsildar, ErodeErode District.WP No. 35356 of 2024 05-03-20258 of 8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments