committed theft of 3 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto v. committed theft of 3 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto
Case Details
Acts & Sections
petitioners committed theft of 4 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.2.12 The case of the prosecution in Crl.O.P.No.28266 of 2024 is that the petitioners committed theft of 17 grams of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.2.13 The case of the prosecution in Crl.O.P.No.28267 of 2024 is that the petitioners committed theft of 2 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.2.14 The case of the prosecution in Crl.O.P.No.28269 of 2024 is that the petitioners committed theft of 3 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. He also submitted that the petitioners are in custody from 25.09.2024 and they are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis police opposed for granting bail to the petitioners stating that petitioners are habitual offendors involved in fourteen similar cases with similar modus operandi.5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.6. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) and considering that the petitioners are habitual offendors, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 12.11.2024sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.SmaCrl.O.P.No.28248 of 2024 etc. batch12.11.2024
petitioners committed theft of 4 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.2.12 The case of the prosecution in Crl.O.P.No.28266 of 2024 is that the petitioners committed theft of 17 grams of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.2.13 The case of the prosecution in Crl.O.P.No.28267 of 2024 is that the petitioners committed theft of 2 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.2.14 The case of the prosecution in Crl.O.P.No.28269 of 2024 is that the petitioners committed theft of 3 sovereigns of gold chain from the defacto complainant at Mambalam Railway Station. Hence the case.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. He also submitted that the petitioners are in custody from 25.09.2024 and they are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis police opposed for granting bail to the petitioners stating that petitioners are habitual offendors involved in fourteen similar cases with similar modus operandi.5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.6. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) and considering that the petitioners are habitual offendors, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 12.11.2024sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.SmaCrl.O.P.No.28248 of 2024 etc. batch12.11.2024