✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

G K ILANTHIRAIYAN

Case at a glance

Bench
G K ILANTHIRAIYAN

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. D.Arumugam, Commissioner, Villianur Commune Panchayat, Villianur, Puducherry & State.... RespondentsPrayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Page 1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 2024 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying order of this…

Judgment

Cont.P.No.3604 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.10.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANCont. P.No. 3604 of 202 4 1. S.Anandavalli2. V.Senthamizhselvan3. S.Yuvaraj ... PetitionersVs.

1.

Dr.Sharat Chouhan, I.A.S.,Chief Secretary to Government, Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry Union State.

2.

T.Chanmougam, Superintendent of Engineer, Electricity Department, Puducherry & State.

3.

D.Arumugam, Commissioner, Villianur Commune Panchayat, Villianur, Puducherry & State.... RespondentsPrayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Page 1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 2024 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying order of this Court dated 12.04.2024 passed in W.P.No.7027 of 2022. Page 2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 2024 For Petitioners: Mr.R.VeeramaniFor Respondents: Mr.A.Tamilvanan Additional Government Pleader (Pondy) ORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order dated 12.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2022, thereby directing the respondents to pay compensation of Rs.26,95,000/- to the petitioners, within a period of twelve weeks. 2. The learned Additional Government Pleader (Pondy) appearing for the respondents submitted that aggrieved by the order passed by this Court, they preferred a Writ Appeal in W.A.No.3045 of 2025, and the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 25.10.2025 granted an interim order of stay on condition that the respondents shall deposit 50% of the compensation to the credit of the Page 3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 2024 Writ Appeal account before this Registry, within a period of four weeks. Page 4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 20243.In view of the above interim order granted by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, the Contempt Petition stands closed at present. The petitioner is at liberty to revive the Contempt Petition subject to the result of the Writ Appeal. 29.10.2025(½) Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non Speaking orderrtsTo1. The Chief Secretary to Government, Union Territory of Puducherry, Puducherry Union State.2. The Superintendent of Engineer, Electricity Department, Puducherry & State.3. The Commissioner, Villianur Commune Panchayat, Villianur, Puducherry & State. Page 5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 2024G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,rtsCont.P.No.3604 of 2024 Page 6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3604 of 202429.10.2025(½) Page 7 of 7

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments