T.Saravanan v. Rep. by its Deputy Registrar.3 Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P.No.33848 of 2017IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 09.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.33848 of 2017T.Saravanan... PetitionerVs.1 Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs and Chairman of the Complaints Committee On Sexual Harassment At Work Place, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.2 Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Guna Complex Annexe – I, 2nd Floor, 443, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018 Rep. by its Deputy Registrar.3 Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, IPR 1 Section, Udyog Bhavan, Delhi – 110 011. Rep. by its Secretary... RespondentsPrayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to furnish a copy of the report on the enquiry conducted pursuant to the notice dated 23.03.2017 made in POC/CHE/compl/SH/2017/ IA15014.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33848 of 2017For Petitioner : Ms.S.Suba ShinyFor Respondents: Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari O R D E RThis writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to furnish a copy of the report on the enquiry conducted pursuant to the notice dated 23.03.2017 made in POC/CHE/compl/SH/2017/ IA15014.2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that during the pendancy of this writ petition, copy of the report on the enquiry conducted pursuant to the notice dated 23.03.2017 was furnished to the petitioner and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. 3.In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 09.10.2025priIndex: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33848 of 2017To1 Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs and Chairman of the Complaints Committee On Sexual Harassment At Work Place, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Building, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.2 Intellectual Property Appellate Board, Guna Complex Annexe – I, 2nd Floor, 443, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018 Rep. by its Deputy Registrar.3 Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, IPR 1 Section, Udyog Bhavan, Delhi – 110 011. Rep. by its Secretary3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33848 of 2017M.DHANDAPANI,J.priW.P.No.33848 of 201709.10.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.