Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, Writ Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. S.Sudha ... RespondentsWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to the order of appointment issued in Na.Ka.No. 1334/ 2015/ PGl. dt.…
Judgment
WP.No.23535 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated:27.09.2024Coram:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALAWP.No.23535 of 2017andWMP.No's. 24681 of 2017, 27294 of 2023 & 14168 of 2024 M.Parameswari ... PetitionerVs.
The District Collecor, O/o. The Collectorate of Vellore, Vellore District.
The Block Development Officer, Ex-Officio-Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Anai Kattu, Anai Kkattu Taluk, Vellore District.
Operative part
S.Sudha ... RespondentsWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to the order of appointment issued in Na.Ka.No. 1334/ 2015/ PGl. dt. 29.01.2016 to the 3rd respondent as Noon Meal Organiser at Pattaiyur Govt. Aided Primary Panchayat Union Noon Page No. 1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.23535 of 2017 Meal Centre in Panchayat Union Primary School under Puratchi Thalaivar MGR Noon Meal Scheme and quash the same and further direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Noon Meal Organiser at Noon Meal Centre at Pattaiyur Govt. aided Primary School, at Pattaiyur within the Anai Kkattu Panchayat Union in Vellore DistrictFor Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha, Special Government Pleaderfor RR1 & 2 Mr.M.Rajendiran, for Mr.T.Saravananfor R3ORDERWhen the writ petition was listed on 06.09.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. Therefore, registry was directed to list the matter on 27.09.2024 under caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. Accordingly, Writ Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected WMP's are closed.27.09.2024dsnPage No. 2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.23535 of 2017To1. The District Collecor, O/o. The Collectorate of Vellore, Vellore District. 2. The Block Development Officer, Ex-Officio-Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Anai Kattu, Anai Kkattu Taluk, Vellore District.N.MALA,J. Page No. 3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.23535 of 2017dsnWP.No.23535 of 2017 27.09.2024Page No. 4 / 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, Writ Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.