High Court · 2025

Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHArb Appln No. 1231 of 2025M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company LimitedChola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 represented by its Authorised Signatory ApplicantVsM/s V- Tech Rep by its Prop Mr.Dineshbhai Jerambhai KhuntS.R.No.263, Plot No.25, Street, No.2, Shed No.2/D, Natraz Industrial Area, Opp Narayan Way Bridge, Gondal Road, Kothariya, Rajkot, Gujarat 360 002. RespondentPRAYERTo Appoint an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the equipment to Applicant which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent's men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with police aid and break open of premises if necessary. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025For Applicant:Mr.D.Pradeep KumarFor Respondent:Mr.S.SarathkumarAdvocate CommissionerORDERThis application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for seizing the equipment in the custody of the respondent, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises. 2. When this application came up for hearing on 26.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:-“This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons. 2. The applicant is a non-banking financial institute and they have lent money to the respondent for the purpose of purchasing a vehicle under the loan agreement dated 11.10.2022. The respondent has committed default in the repayment of the loan as per the terms and conditions of the loan agreement. The applicant has also recalled the loan through its notice dated 13.02.2025. As seen from the statement of account dated 31.07.2025 filed by the applicant, 7.8 installments are in arrears, which the respondent has not paid to the applicant. The total value of the 7.8 installments works to Rs.9,84,304/-. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 20253. Under the loan agreement dated 11.10.2022, the applicant is empowered to repossess the vehicle in case the respondent commits default in the repayment of the loan. There exists an arbitration clause in the loan agreement dated 11.10.2022. The applicant has expressed its willingness to go for arbitration in accordance with the said arbitration clause. The applicant has expressed its difficulty to repossess the vehicle on its own. Since the applicant has made out a prima-facie case for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of repossessing the vehicle from the respondent or wherever it is found. Eventhough this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons, an opportunity must be given to the respondent to take back the vehicle from the applicant once a sum of Rs.9,84,304/- is paid within a period of three days from the date of seizure of the said vehicle from the respondent. 4. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is issuing the following directions:- (a) Mr.S.Sarathkumar, Advocate, having office at No.39, Law Chambers, High Court, Chennai-104, Mobile Nos.95661 13550 & 77086 93463, is appointed as Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons from the respondent or wherever it is available. (b) The Advocate Commissioner is permitted to obtain the police aid whenever required and he is also permitted to break open the premises in case the vehicle is kept in a locked premises in the presence of the police after taking https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025proper inventory. (c) On repossession of the subject vehicle, the Advocate Commissioner shall send a communication to the respondent intimating that a sum of Rs.9,84,304/- is due and payable towards the arrears of installment by the respondent to the applicant, in respect of the aforesaid loan agreement. (d) On receipt of such intimation, the respondent shall pay the aforesaid amount within a period of three days from the date of receipt of a communication from the Advocate Commissioner and on payment of such sum, the applicant shall handover the vehicle back to the respondent and the Advocate Commissioner shall cooperate with the applicant for the same. (e) The applicant shall initiate arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause contained in the contract within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case, the applicant fails to initiate arbitration within the stipulated time, the order passed by this Court today shall stand automatically vacated and the re-possessed vehicle shall also be redelivered back to the respondent by the applicant unconditionally.(f) The Advocate Commissioner shall be paid an initial remuneration of Rs.25,000/- by the applicant within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. All the boarding and lodging expenses shall be borne by the applicant. 5. Notice to the respondent, returnable by 07.10.2025. Private notice is also permitted.6. Post the matter on 07.10.2025.” https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 20253. The private notice that was sent to the respondent has been returned with an endorsement “left”. Hence the apprehension of the applicant that the respondent is trying to secret the equipment is prima facie established. 4. The learned counsel for applicant submitted that the remuneration has already been paid to the learned Advocate Commissioner. 5. In view of the above, in the place of the Advocate Commissioner, Mr.Aniruddhsinh Chandrasinh Parmar, Area Sales Manager is appointed as Receiver for seizing the subject equipment from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required, with police aid. 6. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 08-10-2025ssToM/s V Tech Rep by its Prop Mr Dineshbhai Jerambhai KhuntS.R.No.263, Plot No.25, Street, No.2, Shed No.2/D, Natraz Industrial Area, Opp Narayan Way Bridge, Gondal Road, Kothariya, Rajkot, Gujarat 360 002. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.ssArb Appln No. 1231 of 2025 08-10-2025

Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHArb Appln No. 1231 of 2025M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company LimitedChola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 represented by its Authorised Signatory ApplicantVsM/s V- Tech Rep by its Prop Mr.Dineshbhai Jerambhai KhuntS.R.No.263, Plot No.25, Street, No.2, Shed No.2/D, Natraz Industrial Area, Opp Narayan Way Bridge, Gondal Road, Kothariya, Rajkot, Gujarat 360 002. RespondentPRAYERTo Appoint an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the equipment to Applicant which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent's men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with police aid and break open of premises if necessary. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025For Applicant:Mr.D.Pradeep KumarFor Respondent:Mr.S.SarathkumarAdvocate CommissionerORDERThis application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for seizing the equipment in the custody of the respondent, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises. 2. When this application came up for hearing on 26.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:-“This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons. 2. The applicant is a non-banking financial institute and they have lent money to the respondent for the purpose of purchasing a vehicle under the loan agreement dated 11.10.2022. The respondent has committed default in the repayment of the loan as per the terms and conditions of the loan agreement. The applicant has also recalled the loan through its notice dated 13.02.2025. As seen from the statement of account dated 31.07.2025 filed by the applicant, 7.8 installments are in arrears, which the respondent has not paid to the applicant. The total value of the 7.8 installments works to Rs.9,84,304/-. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 20253. Under the loan agreement dated 11.10.2022, the applicant is empowered to repossess the vehicle in case the respondent commits default in the repayment of the loan. There exists an arbitration clause in the loan agreement dated 11.10.2022. The applicant has expressed its willingness to go for arbitration in accordance with the said arbitration clause. The applicant has expressed its difficulty to repossess the vehicle on its own. Since the applicant has made out a prima-facie case for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of repossessing the vehicle from the respondent or wherever it is found. Eventhough this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons, an opportunity must be given to the respondent to take back the vehicle from the applicant once a sum of Rs.9,84,304/- is paid within a period of three days from the date of seizure of the said vehicle from the respondent. 4. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is issuing the following directions:- (a) Mr.S.Sarathkumar, Advocate, having office at No.39, Law Chambers, High Court, Chennai-104, Mobile Nos.95661 13550 & 77086 93463, is appointed as Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons from the respondent or wherever it is available. (b) The Advocate Commissioner is permitted to obtain the police aid whenever required and he is also permitted to break open the premises in case the vehicle is kept in a locked premises in the presence of the police after taking https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025proper inventory. (c) On repossession of the subject vehicle, the Advocate Commissioner shall send a communication to the respondent intimating that a sum of Rs.9,84,304/- is due and payable towards the arrears of installment by the respondent to the applicant, in respect of the aforesaid loan agreement. (d) On receipt of such intimation, the respondent shall pay the aforesaid amount within a period of three days from the date of receipt of a communication from the Advocate Commissioner and on payment of such sum, the applicant shall handover the vehicle back to the respondent and the Advocate Commissioner shall cooperate with the applicant for the same. (e) The applicant shall initiate arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause contained in the contract within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case, the applicant fails to initiate arbitration within the stipulated time, the order passed by this Court today shall stand automatically vacated and the re-possessed vehicle shall also be redelivered back to the respondent by the applicant unconditionally.(f) The Advocate Commissioner shall be paid an initial remuneration of Rs.25,000/- by the applicant within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. All the boarding and lodging expenses shall be borne by the applicant. 5. Notice to the respondent, returnable by 07.10.2025. Private notice is also permitted.6. Post the matter on 07.10.2025.” https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 20253. The private notice that was sent to the respondent has been returned with an endorsement “left”. Hence the apprehension of the applicant that the respondent is trying to secret the equipment is prima facie established. 4. The learned counsel for applicant submitted that the remuneration has already been paid to the learned Advocate Commissioner. 5. In view of the above, in the place of the Advocate Commissioner, Mr.Aniruddhsinh Chandrasinh Parmar, Area Sales Manager is appointed as Receiver for seizing the subject equipment from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required, with police aid. 6. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 08-10-2025ssToM/s V Tech Rep by its Prop Mr Dineshbhai Jerambhai KhuntS.R.No.263, Plot No.25, Street, No.2, Shed No.2/D, Natraz Industrial Area, Opp Narayan Way Bridge, Gondal Road, Kothariya, Rajkot, Gujarat 360 002. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1231 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.ssArb Appln No. 1231 of 2025 08-10-2025