✦ Madras High Court

ANDAS NO. 1101 OF 2024 CEAT LIMITEDREP BY ITS POWER AGENT MR.MENON v. SAVITHRIW/O. RAGHU NO. 66, REDDY STREET, OOTHUKOTTAI TOWN, OOTHUKOTTAI

R SUBRAMANIAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

This petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

CMP NO. 28017 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-12-2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIANANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPANCMP NO. 28017 of 2024ANDAS NO. 1101 OF 2024 CEAT LIMITEDREP BY ITS POWER AGENT MR.MENON, S/O. K.P.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, BLUE MOON CORAL APARTMENTS, NETHAJI NAGAR, KADAVANTHRA, COCHIN 682 020. NOW REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, NO. 463, DR.ANNIE BESANT ROAD, WORLI, MUMBAI 400 030, MAHARASHTRA APPELLANT(S) VsSAVITHRIW/O. RAGHU NO. 66, REDDY STREET, OOTHUKOTTAI TOWN, OOTHUKOTTAI TALUK, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. AND 9 OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of CPC, to grant interim stay of the judgement and decree dated 06.06.2024 in O.S.No.11 of 2018 on the file of the Additional District Court (FTC), Kanchipuram, till the disposal of the appeal. For Appellant(s): ABISHEK JENASENANAPARAJITHA VISHWANATHSNEHA PARTHASARATHYFor Respondent(s): https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble R.Subramanian J.)We find that the suit in O.S.No.11 of 2018 has been decreed, granting a declaratory relief in favour of the plaintiffs. The decree, as such, is not an executable decree. Hence, this petition for interim stay of such decree cannot be maintained.2. This petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief. (R.SUBRAMANIAN J.) (C.KUMARAPPAN J.)16-12-2024KV

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments