T.Mala v. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NovumTo:1 The Secretary
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above direction, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The Assistant Educational Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.... Respondents in all casesCommon Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 2025the respondents to consider…
- Para 77. With the above direction, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs. 09.09.2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NovumTo:1 The Secretary, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600009.2. The School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600009.3. The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.4.…
Judgment
W.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 09.09.2025CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAW.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 2025T.Mala ... Petitioner in W.P.No.33728 of 2025H.Jayanthi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.33729 of 2025D.Selvarani ... Petitioner in W.P.No.33730 of 2025Vs.1 The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600009.
The Government of Tamilnadu, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600009.
The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.
The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
The District Educational Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.
The Assistant Educational Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.... Respondents in all casesCommon Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 2025the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners' Appeal dated 05.01.2023 with regard to revision of pay in the Elementary School Head Master post in the light of G.O.Ms.No.303, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 11.10.2017 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court. In all casesFor Petitioner : Mr.V.ThirupathiFor Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Special Government Pleader (E) for R2 to R6 COMMON ORDERThis Writ Petitions have been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners' Appeal, dated 05.01.2023 with regard to revision of pay in the Elementary School Head Master post in the light of G.O.Ms.No.303, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 11.10.2017 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.2.
Mrs.S.Mythreye, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondents 2 to 6.3. By consent, the Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal today at the admission stage itself.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 20254. The case of the petitioners is that they have given a representation individually on 25.05.2022 to the 3rd respondent to revise the pay as per G.O.Ms.No.303, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 11.10.2017 and thereafter since no orders have been passed, the petitioners approached this Court by filing W.P.No.30579 of 2022, W.P.No.30573 of 2022 and W.P.No.30578 of 2022 respectively wherein this Court vide orders dated 24.11.2022, dated directed the 4th respondent therein to consider the representation of the petitioners within a period of twelve weeks and accordingly the respondents have disposed of the earlier representation of the petitioners on 26.12.2022, as against which, the petitioners have preferred appeals individually on 05.01.2023 which are pending a year ago.
Hence, the petitioners have filed the present Writ Petitions.5. Though it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the appeals have been preferred on 05.01.2023, no proof has been annexed in the Writ Petitions. However, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioners are directed to handover the proof of appeal dated 05.01.2023 to the third respondent. On filing of the same, the third respondent is directed to pass orders on the Appeals dated 05.01.2023, on 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 2025merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.
Operative part
With the above direction, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs. 09.09.2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NovumTo:1 The Secretary, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600009.2. The School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600009.3. The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.4. The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.5. The District Educational Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.6. The Assistant Educational Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 2025A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA ,J., vumW.P.Nos.33728, 33729 & 33730 of 202509.09.20255 of 5
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.