✦ Madras High Court

M.Reshma Begum v. R.Mohammed Sirajuddin

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

C.R.P.No.4902 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.12.2024CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANC.R.P.No.4902 of 2024M.Reshma Begum .. Petitioner VersusR.Mohammed Sirajuddin .. Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Additional Mahila Court, Egmore of DVC.No.25 of 2021 on merits within a reasonable time frame. For Petitioner: Mr.C.NithyanandamORDERThis petition seeks for expeditious disposal of DVC.No.25 of 2021 pending on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Egmore.2. On 09.12.2024, I called for a report from the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Egmore as to how long the learned Judge requires to dispose of DVC.No.25 of 2021.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.4902 of 20243. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai has sent a report dated 16.12.2024 stating that the case is posted for respondent side evidence on 02.01.2025. She also requested to grant two months time to complete the entire proceedings.4. In the light of the report submitted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai, there shall be direction to the learned Magistrate to dispose of DVC.No.25 of 2021 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.5. With the above direction, this civil revision petition is ordered. No costs. 21.12.2024nlIndex: yes/noSpeaking order/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: yes/no2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.4902 of 2024To1. The Metropolitan Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.4902 of 2024V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.nl C.R.P.No.4902 of 202421.12.20244/4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments