Madras High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This application is disposed of in the above terms
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to extend the mandate and accordingly, the mandate is extended A.No.4646 of 2025 for a period of twelve months from today. This application is disposed of in the above terms.
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH A.No.4646 of 2025 Talisma Corporation Private Limited Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Abhishek Kumar R Having its registered office at Ground Floor, Phoenix-Magnifica, Vijinapura Mahadevapura Ward, Old Madras Road Dooravaninagar, Bangalore 560 016 Vs.
Tamil Nadu e-Governance Agency Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer Having its registered office at No.807 PT. Lee Chengalvarayan Naicker Maligai Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002
The Tamil Nadu Skill Development Corporation Rep. by its Managing Director 8th Floor, CMRL Building, METROS No.327, Anna Salai, Nandanam Chennai 600 035 .. Applicant .. Respondents Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 29-A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to extend the mandate of the sole Arbitrator, Mr.Keerthikiran Murali, Advocate, Chennai, for a further period of one (1) year from the date of the present order for the completion of the arbitration proceedings between the applicant and the respondents. A.No.4646 of 2025 For applicant : Mr.Anidh Gopi M For R1 For R2 : Mr.T.Arunkumar : Mr.C.Sathish This application has been field under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and
O R D E R Conciliation Act, 1996, for the extension of mandate.
2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
In the instant case, even when the reference order was passed, a direction was given to complete the proceedings within a period of six months. This period came to an end on 13.08.2025. The case is now at the stage of filing of reply to the counter claim made by the respondents.
Operative part
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to extend the mandate and accordingly, the mandate is extended A.No.4646 of 2025 for a period of twelve months from today. This application is disposed of in the above terms.
19.09.2025 A.No.4646 of 2025 N. ANAND VENKATESH, J. A.No.4646 of 2025
19.09.2025
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This application is disposed of in the above terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Arbitration and O R D E R Conciliation Act, 1996.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 19 Sep 2025. The bench was N ANAND VENKATESH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.