High Court · 2025

W.P.No.31325 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.07.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan RamasamyW.P.No.31325 of 2023andW.M.P.No.30949 & 30950 of 2025 M/s. Vinayaga Impex,rep. by its Partner, Mr.Jeevabharathi. ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore-1, REAC, Coimbatore – 641 018.2. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi. 3. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Tiruppur, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tiruppur – 641 602. ...Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records in PAN : AANFV0890N for the AY 2017-18 and to quash the impugned order No.DIN & Order No.ITBA/REV/F/REV7/2022-23/1050797346(1) dated 15.03.2023 passed by the first respondent for the AY 2017-18 and the 1/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023impugned order NO.DIN ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1041957948(1) dated 29.03.2022 passed by the second respondent for the AY 2017-18 and to quash the impugned orders as passed without jurisdiction. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Rajkumar For Respondent : Dr.B.Ramaswamy, Senior Standing Counsel OrderThe challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order passed by the first respondent dated 15.03.2023 and the order passed by the second respondent dated 29.03.2022 for the AY 2017-18 and to quash the same. 2. Heard Mr.P.Rajkumar learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3. The issue involved in this Writ Petition is as to whether the re-assessment order passed by the second respondent dated 29.03.2022 is sustainable, inasmuch as, the order has been passed under Faceless assessment even prior to 01.04.2022, which was the date, from which, the 2/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023faceless assessment proceedings were made applicable to Section 147 only from 01.04.2022.4. The issue is no longer res integra, as it is already covered by a decision rendered by this Court in W.P.NO.12538 of 2023 dated 24.11.2023, wherein, it is held as follows:- “ 2. The case of the petitioner/company is that the impugned order came to be passed by the Faceless Assessment Officer without assuming any jurisdiction.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that Section 148 proceedings are initiated and notice under Section 148A(b) was issued on 13.03.2022 and a reply was filed and thereafter, an order was passed again under Section 148A(d) on 31.03.2022 and the reassessment order was passed on 22.03.2023. 4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would further that the Faceless Assessment Officer assumes jurisdiction to make assessment under Section 143(3) and 144 with effect from 01.04.2021 and for making 3/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023reassessment under Section 147, the amendment came into effect from 01.04.2022. 5. Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent would vehemently contend that by virtue of the amendment dated 01.04.2021, Section 144B(iii)(a) and 144B(iii)(c) were brought, in which, it deals with the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act. Therefore, the purpose for introduction of the faceless assessment with effect from 01.04.2021 was to include reassessment proceedings under Section 147 as well. Further, in his counter affidavit, it is stated as follows:- “1. .................. 2. Prior to Finance Act, 2021, while reopening an assessment, the procedure of giving the reasons for reopening and an opportunity to the assessee and the decision of the objectives were required to be followed as per the judgment of this Court in the case GKN Driveshaft(India)LTD Vs ITO 259 ITR 19) (SC). 3. Thus, the new provisions substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 being remedial and benevolent in nature and substituted with a specific aim and object 4/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023to protect the rights and interest of the assessee as well as and the same being in public interest, the respective High Cours have rightly held that the benefit of new provisions shall be made available even in respect of the proceedings relating to past assessment years, provided section 148 has been issued on or after 1 st April, 2021. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the various High Courts in holding so. 4. The present order shall substitute/modify respective judgments and orders passed by the respective High Courts quashing the similar notices issued under unamended Section 148 of the IT Act irrespective of whether they have been assailed before this Court or Union of India Vs. Ashish Agrwal [2022] 135 Taxmann64(SC) (Para2 and page number 26) 5. In subsection (1) of Section 151A of the Income Tax Act, in the opening portion, after the words and figures “issuance of notice under Section 148”, the words, figures and letters “or conducting of enquiries or issuance of showcase notice or passing of order under Section 148A” are inserted Union of India Vs. Ashish Agrwal [2022]135 Taxmann 64 (SC) (Para2 and page number 26) 6. ............” 5.1 Therefore, it is clear that pursuant to 5/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023amendment made w.e.f. 01.04.2021, re-assessment could be made only under the provisions of Section 143(3) and 144 alone. However, in the procedure they have mentioned, it is also for the 148 notice as well. Therefore, the intention to include Section 148 is to empower the Faceless Assessment Officer to make reassessment. 5.2 Further he would submit that Since the 148A(b) notice issued by Faceless Assessment Officer dated 13.03.2022 construed as notice issued by Physical Assessment Officer and reply was also filed, the Physical Assessment Officer may consider the reply. In the event of accepting the reply, the proceedings would go on. In the event of rejection, whatever notice issued under Section 148A(d) as on 31.03.2022, shall be construed as notice issued by Physical Officer. If any adverse orders is going to be passed, in which case, the petitioner may be provided opportunity of personal hearing. In which case, any documents if he wants to file subject to the same, the hearing date may be fixed and thereafter, appropriate order may be passed. 6. I have given due consideration to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner as 6/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023well the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 7. In the present case, it has to be decided whether the Faceless Assessment Officer assumes jurisdiction to issue Section 148 notice or not to make reassessment under Section 147 prior to 01.04.2022? 8. On a reading of the Section 144B, it appears that only the Faceless Assessment Officer assumes jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 143(3) and 144 alone. Thereafter, in the sub-clauses, they have provided the procedures to be adopted in the process of making the faceless assessment, where they have included 148 notice also. Therefore, the confusion arises. Unless, in the main Section, if the power is given for reassessment and in the procedure nothing mentioned, that would not be construed as power for making reassessment. That is the reason, why the respondent came with the new amendment with effect from 01.04.2022, whereby, to empower the Faceless Assessment Officer to make reassessment and also re-computation. Therefore, it is clear that the Faceless Assessment Officer can assume jurisdiction under Section 148 with effect from 01.04.2022. 7/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 20238.1 Under these circumstances, it is clear that he assumes the jurisdiction to issue the notice under Section 148, to make reassessment under Section 147 without having any jurisdiction and issued Section 148A(b) notice dated 13.03.2022 and 148A(d) notice on 31.03.2022, which is a date much prior to the date of commencement of faceless assessment, which is applicable, whereby, the jurisdiction that the Officer assumes is not legal. 8.2 However, the petitioner has participated in the entire proceedings without questioning the jurisdiction and filed a reply and thereafter, the impugned order was passed. Merely participating in the proceedings before the Officer without having jurisdiction and without raising the question of jurisdiction, does not give any jurisdiction to the said Officer and the said order would be against law. 9. Since, the learned Senior Standing Counsel Dr.B.Ramaswamy, would submit that in such view of the matter, this notice issued under Section 148A may be construed as issued by the Physical Officer and said Officer shall proceed with the assessment proceedings in accordance with law. 8/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023 10. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 22.03.2023 is quashed and the 148A(b) notice dated 13.03.2022 issued by Faceless Assessment Officer shall be construed as the notice issued by the physical assessment officer and reply filed by the petitioner shall be considered and appropriate orders may be passed after providing opportunity of personal hearing. It is made clear that subject to the direction of the concerned jurisdictional Physical Officer, the petitioner may be permitted to file the consolidated papers with the convenience of the Officer concerned. The Officer will not act unless and otherwise the papers are immediately transferred from the faceless officer to the Physical Officer. 11. In the event, 148A notice dated 31.03.2022 is construed ''5. Therefore, this Court following the order passed in the aforesaid Writ Petition, is inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition on the similar lines. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed, the impugned orders are quashed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 9/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 202325.07.2025sdIndex : yes/noNeutral Citation : yes/noTo1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore-1, REAC, Coimbatore – 641 018.2. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi. 3. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1) Tiruppur, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tiruppur – 641 602. Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,sd10/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.31325 of 2023W.P.No.31325 of 2023 25.07.202511/11