✦ High Court of India · 08 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Oct 2025
Length
1,128 words

Arb Appln No. 1197 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHArb Appln No. 1197 of 2025M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company LimitedChola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 represented by its Authorised Signatory ApplicantVsM/s Beltflex Conveyor (OPC) Private LimitedB-132, New Loaha MandiNiranjanpur B Dewas Naka, IndoreMadhya Pradesh 452 010 RespondentPRAYERTo appoint an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the equipment to applicant which is morefully described in the Schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent's men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary.For Applicant:Mr.D.Pradeep KumarFor Respondent:Ms.R.JayaAdvocate Commissioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1197 of 2025ORDERThis application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for seizing the equipment in the custody of the respondent, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises. 2. When this application came up for hearing on 25.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:-“This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking for appointment of an advocate commissioner to repossess the equipment from the respondent or wherever available. 2. The applicant is a non banking financial institution. They lent money to the respondent under an agreement for loan dated 12.04.2024. The respondent has committed default in the repayment of the loan as per the said agreement. The applicant has also recalled the loan through their loan recall notice dated 13.02.2025. They have also filed a statement of accounts dated 11.08.2025. As seen from the same, Rs.12,80,305/- is due and payable by the respondent to the applicant. The said amount includes the future installments, penal interest and other incidental charges. However, as on date, the respondent is in arrears of 4.98 installments, which amounts to Rs.1,87,227/-. 3. Under the agreement for loan dated 12.04.2024, the applicant is empowered to repossess the equipment from the respondent in case they commit default in the repayment of the loan. The applicant has expressed its difficulties to repossess the equipment on their own. Under those circumstances, they have filed this application, seeking for appointment of an advocate commissioner to repossess the equipment. The applicant has also undertaken to initiate arbitration in accordance with the arbitration https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1197 of 2025clause contained in the agreement for loan dated 12.04.2024. 4. This Court, after giving due consideration to the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application and after giving due consideration to the documents filed along with this application, is of the considered view that since the respondent is a defaulter in the repayment of loan, this Court is inclined to appoint an advocate commissioner as prayed for in this application. However, in order to enable the respondent to run the equipment even after repossession by the advocate commissioner, this Court is putting the respondent on terms. According to the applicant, a sum of Rs.1,87,227/- is due and payable by the respondent to the applicant towards arrears of installments i.e., 4.98 installments have not been paid by the respondent to the applicant till date. 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court issues the following directions: a) R. Jaya, Advocate having address at No.79, New Addl. Law Chamber, High Court Buildings, Chennai - 600 104 (Mob. No.72999 02445) is appointed as the advocate commissioner to re-posses the equipment morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons from the respondent from their premises or wherever available; b) The advocate commissioner after re-possessing the equipment, shall handover interim custody of the same to the applicant, who shall keep it in their safe custody; c) The advocate commissioner, immediately after re-possessing the subject equipment, shall intimate the respondent either through Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due (RPAD) or by hand delivery through a written communication, that the arrears of installments works out to Rs.1,87,227/-; d) The respondent on payment of Rs.1,87,227/- to the applicant within a period of three days from the date when the subject equipment was re-possessed, is entitled for return of the seized equipment, provided an undertaking is given by the respondent that the respondent shall pay the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1197 of 2025future installments on the due dates, without any default. On receipt of the sum of Rs.1,87,227/- within the stipulated time as stated supra, the applicant shall redeliver the subject equipment back to the respondent with proper acknowledgment and the advocate commissioner shall also render proper assistance for the same; e) The applicant shall initiate arbitration in accordance with the arbitration agreement contained in the contract within a period of 90 days from today. In case, the applicant fails to initiate arbitration within the stipulated time, the order passed by this Court today shall stand automatically vacated and the re-possessed equipment shall also be redelivered back to the respondent by the applicant unconditionally; f) In case, the advocate commissioner requires Police assistance due to any law and order problem or due to any obstruction caused by the respondent or by any third party, while re-possessing the equipment, the advocate commissioner is at liberty to seek police assistance from the concerned police station and the police department shall grant police protection accordingly. In case, break open of the premises, where the equipment is located, is required, the advocate commissioner shall break open the premises in the presence of the police and take an inventory and thereafter re-posses the equipment; g) The advocate commissioner shall be paid an initial remuneration of Rs.25,000/- and on receipt of the same, the advocate commissioner shall proceed to execute this order. All the boarding, lodging and travelling expenses for the advocate commissioner shall be borne by the applicant. 6. Notice to the respondent, returnable by 06.10.2025. Private Notice is also permitted. ” 3. The private notice sent to the respondent has been returned with an endorsement “left” and affidavit of service has also been filed. Hence the apprehension raised on the side of the applicant that the respondent is trying to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1197 of 2025secret the equipment is prima facie established. 4. In view of the above, in the place of the Advocate Commissioner, Mr.Ravi Malbiya, Area Receivables Manager is appointed as Receiver for seizing the subject equipment from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required, with police aid. 5. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 08-10-2025ssToM/s Beltflex Conveyor (OPC) Private LimitedB-132, New Loaha MandiNiranjanpur B Dewas Naka, IndoreMadhya Pradesh 452 010 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1197 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.ssArb Appln No. 1197 of 2025 08-10-2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments