✦ Madras High Court

A.G.Rajapalanisamy v. The Secretary

M DHANDAPANI2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondent to consider the application dated 26.03.2021 made through online and the application dated 25.09.2017 made by the petitioner and…

Judgment

W.P.No.29246 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.10.2024CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.29246 of 2024A.G.Rajapalanisamy ... Petitioner Vs.The Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, New Delhi-110 001. ....RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to renew the petitioner's Notary Registration No.8394 granted by the respondent on 21.09.2010, as per the online application Reference No.NR/2021/05683 dated 26.03.2021 and also by considering the petitioner's applications dated 22.06.2016, 28.06.2016, 17.08.2017 and 25.09.2017. _________Page 1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29246 of 2024 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kaithamalai KumaranFor Respondent : Mr.K.Ramanamoorthy Central Government CounselO R D E RThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to renew the petitioner's Notary Registration No.8394 granted by the respondent on 21.09.2010, as per the online application Reference No.NR/2021/05683 dated 26.03.2021 and by considering the applications dated 22.06.2016, 28.06.2016, 17.08.2017 and 25.09.2017.

2.

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has made applications on 22.06.2016, 28.06.2016, 17.08.2017 and 25.09.2017 before the respondent for renewal of his Notary Registration No.8394 granted by the respondent and has also made application through online on 26.03.2021, however, no action has been taken. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. _________Page 2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29246 of 20243. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the application dated 26.03.2021 made through online and the application dated 25.09.2017 made by the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

4.

The learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondent has no serious objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

Operative part

5.

Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the respondent to consider the application dated 26.03.2021 made through online and the application dated 25.09.2017 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order._________Page 3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29246 of 2024 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 01.10.2024 NCC: Yes / NoIndex : Yes / NoSpeaking Order : Yes / NossbToThe Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, New Delhi-110 001. _________Page 4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29246 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.ssbW.P.No.29246 of 202401.10.2024_________Page 5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29246 of 2024 W.P.No.29246 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.The matter is listed today under the caption "for being mentioned".2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondent. 3. Considering the submissions made, this Court directs the words "no serious objection" in paragraph No.4 of the order dated 01.10.2024 shall be replaced with "serious objection". 04.12.2024ssb Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction in the order and issue order copy on 04.12.2024._________Page 6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29246 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.ssb W.P.No.29246 of 202404.12.2024_________Page 7 of 7

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments