✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

C SARAVANAN

Case at a glance

Bench
C SARAVANAN

Outcome

Disposed of

With these directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

W.P.No.30993 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.10.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANANW.P.No.30993 of 2025andW.M.P.No.34728 of 2025 Tvl. Rainbow Stones Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.Vanam EdukondaluSy no. 227/2M1, 296/1A1, 296/2A1 & 297/2A,Koneripalli – Post, Nallaganakothapalli Village, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu – 635117. ... Petitioner Vs.The Assistant Commissioner, Hosur North – II, Hosur. ... Respondent Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for Respondent’s Order dated 31.01.2025 with Ref. No. ZD330125305563U and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Adithya Reddy For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsha Raj 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30993 of 2025 Special Government PleaderORDERThis case was argued at length along with a batch of writ petitions, after the hearing was concluded, the Court was proceeded to dictate the order.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would like to work out the remedy before the appellate forum.3. The impugned order is dated 31.01.2025. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on 05.08.2025. There is a marginal delay of 90 days in approaching this Court.4. Considering the same and following the consistent view taken by this Court under similar circumstances, this case is disposed with the liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy against the impugned order before the appellate authority, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner’s Electronic Cash Register within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30993 of 20255. If the petitioner makes such deposits and files an appeal within such time, the Appellate Authority namely Deputy Commissioner, GST Appeal Salem, shall dispose of the appeal without further reference to limitation.6.

Operative part

Needless to state, before passing any final order, the petitioner shall be heard.7. In case the petitioner fails to comply with the above stipulations, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in the manner known to law, as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.8. With these directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.29.10.2025rajaNeutral Citation : Yes / NoTo3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30993 of 2025 The Assistant Commissioner, Hosur North – II, Hosur.C.SARAVANAN, J.rajaW.P.No.30993 of 20254/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30993 of 202529.10.20255/6

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With these directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments