✦ Madras High Court

M/s.Bharat Heavy Electronics Ltd v. M/s.NCC Limited(Formerly Nagarjuna Construction Co.Ltd.)4th Floor

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

390 of 2017 stands dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the aforesaid application and also recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner in O.P.No.390 of 2017, Application No.2434 of 2024 is allowed as prayed for and O.P.No.390…

Judgment

O.P No.390 of 2017andAppln. No.2434 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2024 CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY O.P.No.390 of 2017andAppln. No.2434 of 2024M/s.Bharat Heavy Electronics Ltd.,No.690, Anna Salai, NandanamChennai- 600 035. ...Petitioner versus M/s.NCC Limited(Formerly Nagarjuna Construction Co.Ltd.)4th Floor, NCC House, Survey No.64,Madhapur, Hyderabad- 500 081 ... RespondentArbitration Original Petition filed under Section 34(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the Award of the Arbitrator dated 22.02.2017 insofar as the Award awarded Claims under Claim Nos.7 and 9 and interest to the Respondent and rejected the Counter Claim of the Petitioner relating to liquidated damanges in full and the counter claim of the Petitioner relating to Risk and cost recovery in part. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P No.390 of 2017andAppln. No.2434 of 2024 For Petitioner : Mr.Saketh ReddyFor Respondent : Mr.P.J.Rishikesh*** ORDERApplication No.2434 of 2024 has been filed to permit the applicant herein to withdraw the petition in O.P.No.390 of 2017.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

Operative part

3.

In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the aforesaid application and also recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner in O.P.No.390 of 2017, Application No.2434 of 2024 is allowed as prayed for and O.P.No.390 of 2017 stands dismissed as withdrawn.30.04.2024arr 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis O.P No.390 of 2017andAppln. No.2434 of 2024KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,arrO.P.No.390 of 2017andAppln. No.2434 of 202430.04.2024 3/3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: 390 of 2017 stands dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments