✦ High Court of India · 06 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,020 words

CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVICRL RC No. 1444 of 20251. Krishnamurthy PS/o.Perumal, Plot No.91, 1st Floor, Unmai Nagar, 1st Main Road, Opp Mams Play School, Keelkattalai, S.Kolathur,Kancheepuram-600 117Petitioner(s)Vs1. State rep by its the Inspector of PoliceBeta-1 EDF-1, Central Crime Branch-1, Veppery, Chennai Cr.No.34/20252.K.V.Jayavel,S/o.K.C.Vedachalam Chetty, General Manager-Dina color Lab No.53/1, C.P.Ramasamy Road, Abiramapuram, ChennaiRespondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025PRAYERTo call for and examine the records as to the correctness legality or propriety and pass an order to setaside the impugned order passed in Crl.M.P.No.7888 of 2025 in Cr.No.34 of 2025 on the file of the Learned Metropolitan magistrate, for CCB and CBCID Egmore, Chennai dated 16.07.2025CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025For Petitioner(s):K.Sathish KumarD.Shendur Gughan---------Affidavit Of Service FiledFor Respondent(s):Public Prosecutor For R1Court Notice Served For R2R-2 K.V.JAYAVEL, S/o.K.C.Vedachalam Chetty, General Manager-Dina Color Lab No.53/1, C.P.Ramasamy Road, Abiramapuram, ChennaiPrivate Notice Permitted - Proof Filed - Served For R2---------A. ArunP.RajkumarR.AswinSenapathi .R.A For R2ORDERCRL RC No. 1444 of 2025 has been filed to call for and examine the records as to the correctness legality or propriety and pass an order to setaside https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025the impugned order passed in Crl.M.P.No.7888 of 2025 in Cr.No.34 of 2025 on the file of the Learned Metropolitan magistrate, for CCB and CBCID Egmore, Chennai dated 16.07.2025. 2. The respondent police arrested the petitioner/accused for a alleged offences u/s.408, 420, 477A r/w 109, 120(B) of IPC and remanded to judicial custody by this Court in Cr.No.34 of 2025 on 15.03.2025. At the time of arrest the respondent police seized the following articles: (1) Original Sale Deed Document No.3574/2020 (2) Original FPL Vehicle Pvt Ltd Tax Invoice dated 27.06.2023 (3) Original Vehicle RC of TN14-AE-3723 (4) Dell Laptop (5) Laxer 32GB Pendrive (6) Sandesk USB 3.1 Pendrive (7) Laxer 64GB Pendrive (8) Sony 16 GB Pendrive (9) Laxer 64 GB Pendrive (10) Laxer Pendrive (11) OPPO 7 Red Colour Mobile (12) OPPO Reno 10 Purpole Colour Mobile (13) Redmi 9 Orange Colour Mobile (14) Canon 7001 Camera (15) Canon 25250 Lenzy (16) Canon Camera Lethium Battery (17) Canon Camera Charge (18) Cash Rs.1,84,600/- (500 x 338 = 1,69,000/-, 200 x 58 = 11,600/-, 20 x 200 = 4,000/-) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 20253. Hence, he filed the petition before the Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases (Relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai), and CBCID Metro Egmore, Chennai, in Crl.M.P.No.7888/2025 for return of the property. The Court below dismissed the said petition holding that investigation is under half way, it would not be proper to order for return of property. Challenging the order passed by the Trial Court, the petitioner filed this revision.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no way connected with this offence as alleged in FIR. Further, he submits that if a car is kept in police custody without maintenance, it will deteriorate significantly and rapidly and prays to return the other properties also. However, the petitioner is ready to abide with any conditions. Hence, he prays to allow this petition.5. The Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the petitioner along with other accused persons appropriated more than Rs.20 crores. In fact, documents were seized from the petitioner which are necessary for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025investigation. Hence, he raised objection to allow this petition.6. Considering the submissions on either side, the provision under Section 451 of Cr.P.C.,/497(1) of BNSS provides for protection of the property from degradation due to non maintenance in the custody of the police as it takes long time for conclusion of criminal proceedings. The vehicle is in broad day light from the date of seizure and no useful purpose will be served in keeping the vehicles parked in the sunlight and rain. Hence, out of 18 seized articles, this Court is inclined to return vehicle bearing registration No. TN 14 AE 3723 with the condition. Except above vehicle, this Court is not inclined to return other properties, which are very much required for investigation. 7.In view of the above discussions, this Court is inclined to return the vehicle to the petitioner and accordingly, the order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 7888 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025 by the Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases (Relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai), and CBCID Metro Egmore, Chennai, is hereby set aside. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases (Relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai), and CBCID Metro Egmore, Chennai, is directed to return the vehicle bearing https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025Registration No. TN 14 AE 3723 to the petitioner, forthwith on the following conditions:-(i) the petitioner is directed to execute an own bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate to the credit of Crime No.34 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. Further, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-(Ten Lakhs Only) to the credit of Crime No. 34 of 2025 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases (Relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai), and CBCID Metro Egmore, Chennai. (ii) the petitioner shall deposit the original registration certificate of the vehicle with the concerned Magistrate.(iii) the seized item should be photographed at the cost of the petitioner herein and a list is to be prepared and the same is to be signed by the petitioner. (iv) the petitioner shall not alienate and shall not make any alteration in the vehicle.(v) the petitioner shall produce the vehicle before the Court and before the respondent police as and when required; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025(vi) If any of the conditions are violated, this order automatically stands cancelled. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case stands allowed. 06-10-2025pblIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NoTo1. The Metropolitan Magistrate for Exclusive Trial of CCB Cases (Relating to Cheating Cases in Chennai), and CBCID Metro Egmore, Chennai. 2. The Section Officer, V. R Section, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL RC No. 1444 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pblCRL RC No. 1444 of 202506-10-2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments