High Court · 2025

WP No. 30043 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHWP No. 30043 of 20251. SUNDARAMS/o. Late Madhaiyan, No.10-11, 87.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /Revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ Lakshmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025D/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.ShanthiS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84A.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem DistrictRespondent(s)PRAYERWrit petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose the appeal of the petitioner dated 18.02.2025 for cancellation of forged legal heir certificates of Ramasamy Boyan within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s):Mr.M.R. JothimanianFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.NeelakandanAdditional Advocate GeneralAssisted byMr.T.M.RajangamGovernment Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDERThis matter is listed today under the caption “For being mentioned”.2. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025petitioner, the following modifications are made in Paragraphs Nos.3, 4 and 5 of the order dated 08.08.2025.“3.The specific case of the petitioner is that the private respondents have created a bogus death certificate of Ramasamy Boyan as if he died on 15.10.1966. There is yet another death certificate available, which was issued by the Village Administrative Officer where it is mentioned that the said Ramasamy Boyan died on 14.05.1985. According to the petitioner, both these death certificates are bogus and based on the same, the documents have been created by the private respondents. The petitioner claims to be the great grand son of the said Ramasamy Boyan. There are proceedings pending between the parties. However, in the present writ petition, the subject matter of challenge pertains to the alleged bogus death certificates issued after the demise of Ramasamy Boyan.4.The petitioner submitted an appeal before the 2nd respondent on 18.02.2025 in this regard. Since the said representation did not evoke any response, subsequent representation was made on 18.07.2025 and the same also https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025did not evoke any response. It is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 18.02.2025 on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the petitioner and the private respondents and final decision shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”3.Registry is directed to carryout the necessary corrections in the order dated 08.08.2025and issue a fresh order copy by today.20-08-2025Note: Issue order copy on 20.08.2025 (today)gdIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025To1.The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ LakshmiD/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.SHANTHIS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84a.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.gdWP No. 30043 of 202520.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHWP No. 30043 of 20251. SUNDARAMS/o. Late Madhaiyan, No.10-11, 87.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /Revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ LakshmiD/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.ShanthiS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84A.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem DistrictRespondent(s)PRAYERWrit petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose the appeal of the petitioner dated 18.02.2025 for cancellation of forged legal heir certificates of Ramasamy Boyan within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s):Mr.M.R. JothimanianFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.NeelakandanAdditional Advocate GeneralAssisted byMr.T.M.RajangamGovernment Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDERThis writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 18.02.2025 wherein the petitioner is seeking for cancellation of the alleged legal heir ship certificate of Ramasamy Boyan within the time frame fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 20252.Heard Mr.M.R.Jothimanian, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.T.M.Rajangam, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3.3.The specific case of the petitioner is that the private respondents have created a bogus death certificate of Ramasamy Boyan as if he died on 15.10.1996. There is yet another death certificate available, which was issued by the Village Administrative Officer where it is mentioned that the said Ramasamy Boyan died on 30.05.2014. According to the petitioner, both these death certificates are bogus and based on the same, the documents have been created by the private respondents. The petitioner claims to be the great grand son of the said Ramasamy Boyan. There are proceedings pending between the parties. However, in the present writ petition, the subject matter of challenge pertains to the alleged bogus death certificates issued after the demise of Ramasamy Boyan.4.The petitioner submitted an appeal before the 2nd respondent on 28.02.2025 in this regard. Since the said https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025representation did not evoke any response, subsequent representation was made on 18.07.2025 and the same also did not evoke any response. It is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 28.02.2025 on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the petitioner and the private respondents and final decision shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 08-08-2025rkaIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025To1.The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ LakshmiD/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.SHANTHIS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84a.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.rkaWP No. 30043 of 202508.08.2025

WP No. 30043 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHWP No. 30043 of 20251. SUNDARAMS/o. Late Madhaiyan, No.10-11, 87.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /Revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ Lakshmi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025D/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.ShanthiS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84A.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem DistrictRespondent(s)PRAYERWrit petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose the appeal of the petitioner dated 18.02.2025 for cancellation of forged legal heir certificates of Ramasamy Boyan within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s):Mr.M.R. JothimanianFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.NeelakandanAdditional Advocate GeneralAssisted byMr.T.M.RajangamGovernment Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDERThis matter is listed today under the caption “For being mentioned”.2. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025petitioner, the following modifications are made in Paragraphs Nos.3, 4 and 5 of the order dated 08.08.2025.“3.The specific case of the petitioner is that the private respondents have created a bogus death certificate of Ramasamy Boyan as if he died on 15.10.1966. There is yet another death certificate available, which was issued by the Village Administrative Officer where it is mentioned that the said Ramasamy Boyan died on 14.05.1985. According to the petitioner, both these death certificates are bogus and based on the same, the documents have been created by the private respondents. The petitioner claims to be the great grand son of the said Ramasamy Boyan. There are proceedings pending between the parties. However, in the present writ petition, the subject matter of challenge pertains to the alleged bogus death certificates issued after the demise of Ramasamy Boyan.4.The petitioner submitted an appeal before the 2nd respondent on 18.02.2025 in this regard. Since the said representation did not evoke any response, subsequent representation was made on 18.07.2025 and the same also https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025did not evoke any response. It is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 18.02.2025 on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the petitioner and the private respondents and final decision shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”3.Registry is directed to carryout the necessary corrections in the order dated 08.08.2025and issue a fresh order copy by today.20-08-2025Note: Issue order copy on 20.08.2025 (today)gdIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025To1.The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ LakshmiD/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.SHANTHIS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84a.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.gdWP No. 30043 of 202520.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHWP No. 30043 of 20251. SUNDARAMS/o. Late Madhaiyan, No.10-11, 87.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /Revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ LakshmiD/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.ShanthiS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84A.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem DistrictRespondent(s)PRAYERWrit petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose the appeal of the petitioner dated 18.02.2025 for cancellation of forged legal heir certificates of Ramasamy Boyan within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s):Mr.M.R. JothimanianFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.NeelakandanAdditional Advocate GeneralAssisted byMr.T.M.RajangamGovernment Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDERThis writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 18.02.2025 wherein the petitioner is seeking for cancellation of the alleged legal heir ship certificate of Ramasamy Boyan within the time frame fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 20252.Heard Mr.M.R.Jothimanian, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Neelakandan, learned Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.T.M.Rajangam, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3.3.The specific case of the petitioner is that the private respondents have created a bogus death certificate of Ramasamy Boyan as if he died on 15.10.1996. There is yet another death certificate available, which was issued by the Village Administrative Officer where it is mentioned that the said Ramasamy Boyan died on 30.05.2014. According to the petitioner, both these death certificates are bogus and based on the same, the documents have been created by the private respondents. The petitioner claims to be the great grand son of the said Ramasamy Boyan. There are proceedings pending between the parties. However, in the present writ petition, the subject matter of challenge pertains to the alleged bogus death certificates issued after the demise of Ramasamy Boyan.4.The petitioner submitted an appeal before the 2nd respondent on 28.02.2025 in this regard. Since the said https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025representation did not evoke any response, subsequent representation was made on 18.07.2025 and the same also did not evoke any response. It is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 28.02.2025 on its own merits and in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the petitioner and the private respondents and final decision shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 08-08-2025rkaIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025To1.The District CollectorSalem District, Salem.2.The Sub Collector /revenue Divisional OfficerMettur Revenue Division, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District3.The TahsildharMettur Taluk, Mettur Dam-1, Salem District4.Chinnasamy,S/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District5.RAMASAMYS/o. Ramasamy Boyan, Boyar Street, Bannavadi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District6.Kutchi @ LakshmiD/o. Gurusamy, Boyar Street, Ayyampudur, Singiripatty Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District7.SHANTHIS/o. Subramaniam, No.10-11 84a.G. Munusamy Gounder Theru, Kolathur -636 303, Mettur Taluk, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 30043 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.rkaWP No. 30043 of 202508.08.2025