Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Inasmuch as the writ petition has become a infructuousone, recording the said fact, the writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate:- 08.06.2012CoramThe Honourable Mr. Justice M. VENUGOPALW.P. No.45759 of 20061. K. Nagarajan2. R.S. Mookaiah... Petitioners..Vs..
The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, seeking to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to ratify the appointment of the petitioners as DeputyBlock Development Officer without insisting for service qualification and further direct the respondents to promote the petitioners as Block Development Officer from the date on which their immediate juniors were promoted as Block Development Officers with all consequential benefits such as arrears of pay, refixation of pay, seniority etc. For Petitioner : Ms. J. Hemalatha for Mr. V. SuthakarFor Respondents : Mr. R. Vijayakumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ `
Operative part
O R D E RLearned Additional Government Pleader informs this Courtthat the petitioners were promoted as Block Development Officers and they joined duty as such on 11.12.2006.2. In view of the fact that the petitioners have sought the relief of promoting them as Block Development Officers, the writ petition has become an infructuous one. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.3. Inasmuch as the writ petition has become a infructuousone, recording the said fact, the writ petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/Asst. Registrar/true copy/Sub Asst. Registrarssa. To1. The Secretary to the Governmentof Tamil Nadu, Rural Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.2. The Director of Rural Development, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.3. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.+ 1 cc to the Government Pleader Sr.32172 W.P. No.45759 of 2006SGL(CO)Eu 18.6.12
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.