S.Prem Kumar v. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Coimbatore
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
This being the scope of the provisions, the Writ Petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Authorities along with documents if any
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 ss. 258(1), 441
- Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act s. 441
Judgment
W.P.No.30827 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026C O R A MTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPANW.P.No.30827 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.34526 & 34527 of 2025S.Prem Kumar ... Petitioner -vs-The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Coimbatore. ... RespondentPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent’s notice dated 13.06.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to remove the lock and seal to the petitioner’s building in Door No.10, HUDCO Nagar, (M.K.Auto Nagar), Idaiyarpalayam, Coimbatore. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30827 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.N.K.PonrajFor Respondent : Mr.N.Velmurugan, Standing Counsel*****
O R D E R(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.,)Notice issued under Sections 258(1) and 441 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 is under challenge in the present Writ Petition. 2. The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation issued notice asking the petitioner to remove the encroachments and obstructions, failing which penal actions will be initiated under Section 441 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”]. 3. Section 258(1) of the Act reads as under:-258. Removal of encroachments. (1)The Commissioner may, by notice, require the owner or occupier of any premises to remove or alter any projection, encroachment or obstruction (other than a door, gate, bar or, ground-floor window) situated, against or in front of such 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30827 of 2025premises and in or over any street or any public place the control of which is vested in the corporation.
4. Therefore, the petitioner is bound to remove the encroachments or obstructions, if any, and report the same to the Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, failing which, the Commissioner is empowered to initiate penal action under Section 441 of the Act. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the representation has already been submitted. 6. If so, the same may be looked into by the Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation before initiation of further action under Section 441 of the Act. However, civil rights cannot be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition. The submission made on behalf of the petitioner that the subject property is a patta land cannot be adjudicated in the Writ proceedings. Either the petitioner has to prove that it is his patta land or remove the encroachments as stated by the Corporation Authorities in the impugned notice.3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30827 of 20257.
Operative part
This being the scope of the provisions, the Writ Petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Authorities along with documents if any. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S,J.,) (C.K,J.,) 02.02.2026Index: Yes / NoInternet: Yes / Nodsa4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30827 of 2025To:The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation, Coimbatore. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30827 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDC.KUMARAPPAN, J.dsaW.P.No.30827 of 202502.02.20266/6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This being the scope of the provisions, the Writ Petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Authorities along with documents if any
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 — ss. 258(1), 441; Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act — s. 441.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.