✦ High Court of India · 15 Dec 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Dec 2025
Length
1,248 words

Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYCONT P No. 3657 of 2025ANDSUB APPL NO. 1305 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1300 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1303 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1301 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1302 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1298 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1299 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1304 OF 2025Justice K.Kalyanasundaram (Retd.)The Administrator, Former Judge, Sterling Tree Magnum India Ltd., No.10, 2nd Floor, Kondi Street, Chennai-600 001.Petitioner(s)Vs1.Mrs.SuseelaThe District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.2.Mrs.Jajitha,The Sub Registrar, Gandharvakottai Sub Registrar Office, Pudukkottai District.3.M/s.Arasfirma,Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Nivin, S/o. Vishnu, Having registered Office at No. 5/113/1, Tirupur Main Road, Avinashilingampalayam, Palangarai, Avinashi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu - 641 654.1/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 20254.M/s. Zaron Industries,Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Nivin, S/o. Vishnu, Having registered Office at No. 4/333/7, Kaikattipudur Post, Avinashi, N.H By-Pass Road, Avinashilingampalayam, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu - 641 654.5.M/s. Viridis Engineering India Private Limited,Rep. by its Director, Mrs. D.Leeladevi, W/o. Mageswaran, Having registered Office at No.6, G.K. Sundaram Street, K.K.Pudur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 038.6.M/S. Topaaz Industries,Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Nivin, S/o. Vishnu, Having registered Office at 3rd Bay, MD 598, Canara Bank, Kayarambedu, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu - 603 202. (Impleaded as 3rd to 6th Respondents as per the Order of the Hon'ble Court made in Sub Appl. Nos.1285 to 1288 of 2025 in Cont.P.No.3657/2025, dated 26.11.2025)Contemnor(s)PRAYER:-Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the Order dated 02.08.2024 made in Comp.A.No. 269 of 2024 passed by this Court.For Petitioner:Mr.N.S.Suganthan2/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025For Respondent : Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader Mr.T.Sai Krishnan for Mr.S.Sidhartha Vishnu for R3 to R6ORDERThis contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner on the ground that though this Court passed an order directing not to entertain any document in respect of the subject properties, the respondents 1 & 2 registered the sale deeds in respect of the subject properties, which were purchased by the respondents 3 to 6.2.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 6 would submit that they were not aware of the order of this Court dated 02.08.2024 made in Comp.A.No.269 of 2024, while purchasing the subject properties and now the respondents 3 to 6 in order to give quietus to the issue, offers to pay Rs.4,00,000/- per acre in addition to the amount which they have paid to their vendor for the subject properties and the petitioner also agreed for the same.3.When such being case, this Court need not proceed further in this case. The respondents 3 to 6 are permitted to deposit the amount offered 3/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025by them to the credit of the C.P.No.73 of 2000.4.Recording the submissions made by either parties, this contempt petition stands closed.5.However, learned counsel for the respondents 3 to 6 filed a Sub Applications seeking to ratify sale deeds in Doc.No.3776 of 2024 dated 22.08.2024, Doc.No. 5553 of 2024 dated 05.12.2024, Doc.No.5551 & 5332 of 2024 dated 22.11.2024 in Doc.No.3777 of 2024 dated 22.08.2024 and to declare it as valid sale deeds by receiving a sale consideration of Rs.4,00,000/- per acre to the credit of the 1st respondent.6.This Court while sitting in Contempt jurisdiction cannot ratify the sale deeds as prayed by the respondents 3 to 6 and therefore, the Registry is directed to post those Sub Applications before the appropriate Court handling Company Applications.27-11-2025rstIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No4/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.,rstCONT P No. 3657 of 2025AND SUB APPL NO. 1305 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1300 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1303 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1301 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1302 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1298 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1299 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 1304 OF 202527.11.20255/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 15.12.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYCont.P.No.3657 of 2025and Sub.A.Nos.1305, 1300, 1303, 1301, 1302, 1298, 1299 and 1304 of 2025Justice K.Kalyanasundaram (Retd.)The Administrator, Former Judge,Sterling Tree Magnum India Ltd.,No.10, 2nd Floor, Kondi Street,Chennai-600 001.... PetitionerVs1.Mrs.Suseela The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.2.Mrs.Jajitha, The Sub Registrar, Gandharvakottai Sub Registrar Office, Pudukkottai District.3.M/s.Arasfirma, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Nivin, S/o. Vishnu, Having registered Office at No. 5/113/1, Tirupur Main Road, Avinashilingampalayam, Palangarai, Avinashi, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu - 641 654.6/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 20254.M/s. Zaron Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Nivin, S/o. Vishnu, Having registered Office at No. 4/333/7, Kaikattipudur Post, Avinashi, N.H By-Pass Road, Avinashilingampalayam, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu - 641 654.5.M/s. Viridis Engineering India Private Limited, Rep. by its Director, Mrs. D.Leeladevi, W/o. Mageswaran, Having registered Office at No.6, G.K. Sundaram Street, K.K.Pudur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 038.6.M/S. Topaaz Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mr. Nivin, S/o. Vishnu, Having registered Office at 3rd Bay, MD 598, Canara Bank, Kayarambedu, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu - 603 202.... Respondents(Impleaded as 3rd to 6th Respondents as per theOrder of the Hon'ble Court made in Sub Appl.Nos.1285 to 1288 of 2025 in Cont.P.No.3657/2025,dated 26.11.2025)Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the Order dated 02.08.2024 made in Comp.A.No. 269 of 2024 passed by this Court.7/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sai Krishnan for Mr.Sidhartha VishnuFor Respondents : Mr.U.BaranidharanSpecial Government PleaderMr.T.Sai Krishnanfor Mr.S.Sidhartha Vishnufor R3 to R6O R D E R This matter is listed today under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 6.3. Considering the submissions made by all the parties, this Court is inclined to modify the order. Accordingly, paragraph Nos.2, 5 and 6 of the order dated 27.11.2025, is modified as follows:8/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025“2.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 to 6 would submit that they were not aware of the order of this Court dated 02.08.2024 made in Comp.A.No.269 of 2024, while purchasing the subject properties and now the respondents 3 to 6 in order to give quietus to the issue, met with the learned Administrator and offered to pay Rs.4,75,000/- per acre in addition to the amount which they have paid to their vendor for the subject properties and the petitioner also agreed for the same and recorded in the minutes of meeting held on 24.11.2025.....5.However, learned counsel for the respondents 3 to 6 filed a Sub Applications seeking to ratify sale deeds in Doc.No.3776 of 2024 dated 22.08.2024, Doc.No. 5553 of 2024 dated 05.12.2024, Doc.No.5551 & 5332 of 2024 dated 22.11.2024 in Doc.No.3777 of 2024 dated 22.08.2024 and to declare it as valid sale deeds by receiving a sale consideration of Rs.4,75,000/- per acre to the credit of the 1st respondent.6. This Court while sitting in Contempt jurisdiction cannot ratify the sale deeds as prayed by the respondents 3 to 6 and therefore, the Registry is directed to post the Sub Applications in Sub. Appl Nos.1303, 1301, 1299 and 1304 of 2025 before the appropriate Court handling Company Applications. Consequently, the Sub Applications in Sub. Appl No.1298, 1300, 1302 and 1305 of 2025 are closed.”9/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 20254. Registry is directed to carry out necessary corrections and issue fresh order copy to the respective parties. 15.12.2025vsmIndex : Yes/NoNCC : Yes/No10/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 2025KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.vsmCont.P.No.3657 of 202511/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3657 of 202515.12.202512/12

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments