✦ High Court of India · 09 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Sep 2025
Length
1,032 words

Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHArb Appln No. 1004 of 20251. Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd.,Chola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.Represented by its Authorised Signatory.Appellant(s)VsMuhammad Faisal APS/o.Abdullah K, Aranthala Puthiya Purayil, Koyipra, Vellore, Kannur, Koyipra Mazjid, Taliparamba, Kerala 670 306.Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025PRAYERThis application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the Construction equipment to applicant which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary.For Applicant :Mr.D.Pradeep KumarORDERThis application has been filed for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver the vehicle to the applicant.2.This Court passed the following order on 25.7.2025.This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner by this Court to re-possess the vehicle from the respondent or wherever available. 2.The applicant is a Non-banking Financial Institution. They have entered into the Loan Agreement dated 30.09.2021 with the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025respondent. Under the said loan agreement, the respondent has availed loan from the applicant for the purchase of the vehicle, morefully described in the schedule to the judges summons. According to the applicant, the respondent has committed default in re-payment of the loan. The applicant has recalled the loan granted to the respondent through their loan recall notice dated 14.05.2025. No reply has been received to the same. The agreement dated 30.09.2021 contains an arbitration clause. The applicant has already initiated arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause and the arbitration is pending. 3.According to them, the respondent has paid only 36.10 installments out of the total 60 installments payable by them. As on date, the respondent is in arrears of 8.89 installments. The arrears of installments alone work out to a total sum of Rs.2,69,522/-. The applicant has also filed statement of account dated 02.07.2025 along with this application, which reveals that a sum of Rs.8,19,944.15 is due and payable by the respondent to the applicant. The applicant is empowered to repossess the vehicle from the respondent, as per the terms of the loan agreement, in case, the respondent commits default in repayment of the loan. The applicant claims that they are having difficulties in re-possessing the vehicle on their own. Only under those circumstances, they have filed this application seeking for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle from the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025respondent or wherever available. 4.This Court is of the considered view that a prima facie case has been made out by the applicant for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. Once the vehicle is re-possessed by the Advocate Commissioner, to enable the respondent to use the vehicle once again, they must be put on terms for getting back the vehicle from the applicant after re-possession. In order to strike a balance, the following order is passed by this Court: a)Mr.E.Senthilnathan, Advocate, having office at No.5, New No.9, F.M.Plaza, 3rd Floor, Bakker Street, Chennai - 600 001 (Mob. No.82487 34070) is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner to re-posses the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons from the respondent's premises or wherever available; b)The Advocate Commissioner after re-possessing the vehicle, shall handover interim custody of the same to the applicant, who shall keep it in their safe custody; c)The Advocate Commissioner, immediately after re-possessing the subject vehicle, shall intimate the respondent either through Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due (RPAD) or by hand delivery through a written communication that the arrears of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025installments works out to Rs.2,69,522/-; d)The respondent, on payment of Rs.2,69,522/- to the applicant within a period of three days from the date when the subject vehicle was re-possessed, is entitled for return of the seized vehicle. On receipt of the sum of Rs.2,69,522/- within the stipulated time as stated supra, the applicant shall re-deliver the subject vehicle back to the respondent with proper acknowledgement and the advocate commissioner shall also render proper assistance for the same; e)In case, the Advocate Commissioner requires Police assistance due to any law and order problem or due to any obstruction caused by the respondent or by any third party, while re-possessing the vehicle, the advocate commissioner is at liberty to seek police assistance from the concerned police station and the police department shall grant police protection accordingly. In case, break open of the premises, where the vehicle is located, is required, the Advocate Commissioner shall break open the premises in the presence of the police and take an inventory and thereafter re-posses the vehicle; f)The Advocate Commissioner shall be paid an initial remuneration of Rs.25,000/- and on receipt of the same, the advocate commissioner shall proceed to execute this order. All the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025boarding, lodging and travelling expenses for the Advocate Commissioner shall be borne by the applicant. Notice to the respondent returnable by 26.08.2025. Private Notice is also permitted. 3.Pursuant to the above order, the Advocate Commissioner has seized the vehicle and handed over the custody to the representative of the applicant Company.4.The private notice sent to the respondent has been served and affidavit of service has also been filed. There is no appearance either in person or through counsel for the respondent.5.In the light of the earlier order passed by this Court on 25.7.2025 and also of the fact that already vehicle has been seized and handed over to the applicant, no further orders are required in this application. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 20256.This application is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.09-09-2025Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NoKPTo Muhammad Faisal APS/o.Abdullah K, Aranthala Puthiya Purayil, Koyipra, Vellore, Kannur, Koyipra Mazjid, Taliparamba, Kerala 670 306. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1004 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.KPArb Appln No. 1004 of 2025 09-09-2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments