S.VenkateshwaranS/o.Sundar v. The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
27888 & 27889 of 2025These writ petitions are disposed of with the above direction
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. On carefully going through the records placed before this Court, it is seen that there is absolutely no acknowledgement for having given the representations to the Wakf Board. In view of the same, it is left open to the petitioners to submit a fresh…
Judgment
Writ Petition Nos.27888 & 27889 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESHWrit Petition Nos.27888 & 27889 of 2025S.VenkateshwaranS/o.Sundar... Petitioner in W.P.No.27888/ 2025S.Meenakumari SundarW/o.Sundar... Petitioner in W.P.No.27889/ 2025VsThe Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, represented by its Chairman, No.1, Jaffar Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.... Respondent in both petitionsWrit Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to execute the lease agreement to the petitioner in accordance with the Wakf Properties Lease Rules – 2014 vide representations dated 05.02.2025 and 17.12.2024 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioners: Mr.Y.Kaja Navas[in both W.Ps.]For Respondent: Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi[in both W.Ps.] Senior Standing Counsel *****1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition Nos.27888 & 27889 of 2025COMMON
O R D E RThese writ petitions have been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to deal with the representations made by the petitioners on 05.02.2025 and 17.12.2024 respectively wherein the petitioners are seeking for execution of lease agreement in their favour in line with the Wakf Properties Lease Rules, 2014.
Heard Mr.Y.Kaja Navas, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for respondent.
Operative part
On carefully going through the records placed before this Court, it is seen that there is absolutely no acknowledgement for having given the representations to the Wakf Board. In view of the same, it is left open to the petitioners to submit a fresh representation to the respondent along with all the relevant documents and on receipt of the same, the respondent shall deal with the same on its own merits and in accordance with law, take a decision and convey the same to the petitioners preferably within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation from the petitioners.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition Nos.27888 & 27889 of 2025 These writ petitions are disposed of with the above direction. No costs.29.07.2025Neutral Citation: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/noSpeaking Order/Non-Speaking OrdergmToThe Chairman, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffar Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition Nos.27888 & 27889 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH, JgmWrit Petition Nos.27888 & 27889 of 202529.07.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 27888 & 27889 of 2025These writ petitions are disposed of with the above direction
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.