Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above directions, this Second Appeal is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Considering the submissions of both parties, this Court fixes Rs.18,00,000/- [Rupees eighteen lakhs only] as final and one time settlement to the respondent/defendant. The appellants are directed to pay the said amount of Rs.18,00,000/- [Rupees eighteen lakhs only] to the respondent by way of…
Judgment
SA No. 728 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVISA No. 728 of 20251. K.Shanmugam,S/o.Kanniappa Mudaliar, residing at No.15, Muthiah Mudali 1st Lane, Old Washermenpet, Chennai -600 021. S.Kalavathy (Died)
S.Lakshmi,D/o.K.Shanmugam, residing at No.15, Muthiah Mudali 1st Lane, Old Washermenpet, Chennai -600 021.
P.Deivanayaki,D/o.K.Shanmugam, residing at No.15, Muthiah Mudali 1st Lane, Old Washermenpet, Chennai -600 021. Appellant(s)Vs1. G.Sureshkumar,S/o.Late Gisulal, No.494, T.H.Road, Old Washermenpet, Chennai -600 021. Respondent(s)PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and Decree dated 07.04.2025 made in A.S.No.91 of 2024 on the file of V Additional City Civil Court at Chennai by confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 18.10.2023 made in O.S.No.668 of 2019 on the file of XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, and to allow the Second Appeal and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 728 of 2025 For Appellant(s):Mr.C.PrabakaranFor Respondent(s):Mr.Sarath Chandran For Mr.Vikram B.JainJUDGMENTChallenging the concurrent finding of the Courts below, this Second Appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs. 2. When this appeal was posted on 02.02.2026, the learned counsel for both sides sought time for reporting settlement. This Court also directed the parties to file calculation memo. 3. When the matter is taken up today, both the parties and their counsel appeared and both sides submitted calculation memo.
Operative part
Considering the submissions of both parties, this Court fixes Rs.18,00,000/- [Rupees eighteen lakhs only] as final and one time settlement to the respondent/defendant. The appellants are directed to pay the said amount of Rs.18,00,000/- [Rupees eighteen lakhs only] to the respondent by way of a demand draft within a period of four weeks. On such payment, the respondent is directed to hand over all the documents belonging to the appellant and the registered mortgage is also ordered to be cancelled. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 728 of 20255. With the above directions, this Second Appeal is disposed of. No costs.6. Post for reporting compliance on 11.03.2026. 06-02-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: YesNeutral Citation: Yes/NovrcTo1. The V Additional Judge [TADA], City Civil Court, Chennai.2. The XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 728 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI J.vrcSA No. 728 of 2025 06-02-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above directions, this Second Appeal is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.