✦ Madras High Court

W.J.Selva Kumar v. The Chairman

T RAJA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

However, since none appears for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. However, since none appears for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.04.03.2019Index: Yes/ NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking /Non-speaking ordertsi http://www.judis.nic.in 3To1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35.2. The Manager, Marketing & Services…

Judgment

1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.03.2019CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJAW.P.No.29759 of 2007 andM.P.No.1 of 2007W.J.Selva Kumar ...PetitionerVs1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35.

2.

The Manager, Marketing & Services, K.K. Nagar Division, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-83.

3.

The Assistant Engineer, Allotment Section, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35. ... RespondentsPrayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for relevant records from the 2nd and 3rd respondents, to quash the Letter No.Othu 14/33629/07 dated 23.07.2007 issued by the 3rd respondent and consequently, direct the respondents to confirm the sale as per the auction held on 22.02.2007. http://www.judis.nic.in 2 For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Anandhamoorthy, Standing Counsel for R1 to 3

O R D E RQuestioning the correctness of the impugned order dated 23.07.2007 issued by the 3rd respondent and to quash the same, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 2. When the matter is called today, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Mr.V.Anandhamoorthy, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that nothing survives in the Writ Petition and the Writ Petition may be closed.

Operative part

4.

However, since none appears for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.04.03.2019Index: Yes/ NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking /Non-speaking ordertsi http://www.judis.nic.in 3To1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35.2. The Manager, Marketing & Services, K.K. Nagar Division, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Ashok Nagar, Chennai-83.3. The Assistant Engineer, Allotment Section, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-35. http://www.judis.nic.in 4T.RAJA, J. tsiW.P.No.26759 of 200704.03.2019

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: However, since none appears for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments