Gowri Shankar v. State
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 143, 145, 482
- Right to Information Act, 2005
Judgment
Operative part
Crl.O.P.No.22803 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.01.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESHCrl.O.P.No.22803 of 2023andCrl.M.P.No.15957 of 2023 Gowri Shankar ... Petitioner Vs.State rep by Inspector of PoliceB-4 Sevvapet Police Station, Tiruvallur District... RespondentPRAYER : The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in Crime No.109 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.SureshFor Respondent: Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Cr.No.109 of 2022, registered by the respondents under Section 143 Cr.P.C. Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22803 of 20232. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner produced the information furnished by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur, under the Right to Information Act, on 18.01.2024. He has stated that till date no records have been received by the Revenue Divisional Officer from the respondent.3. The learned Government Advocate submitted that since there was a dispute between two groups in administering the temple, the matter was also referred to the Joint Commissioner of HR and CE Department to conduct an enquiry.4. In the considered view of this Court, the very purpose of initiating proceedings under Section 145 of Cr.P.C is to take control of a dispute which is likely to cause an imminent breach of peace. The case was registered as early as on 08.04.2022 and till date the records have not even reached the RDO. It only means that the situation has not worsened and hence no useful purpose will be served in keeping the FIR pending. In view of the same, the FIR registered in Cr.No.109/2022, on the file of the respondent Police stands quashed. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22803 of 20235. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes/No19.01.2024Internet : Yes/NoskTo1. The Inspector of Police B-4 Sevvapet Police Station, Tiruvallur District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22803 of 2023N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.skCrl.O.P.No.22803 of 2023andCrl.M.P.No.15957 of 202319.01.2024Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 143, 145, 482; Right to Information Act, 2005.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.