Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S M SUBRAMANIAM, ANDK KUMARESH BABU
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44.The Section Officer, PWD - Irrigation Division, Water Resources Organization, Senkundram, Chennai-52...RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to form-III in Notice No.960/P.A./ FILE-11/ dated 29.07.2024 of the…
Judgment
WP No. 25088 of 2024__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAMANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUWP No. 25088 of 2024andWMP.Nos.27411 & 27412 of 2024G.Varghese ..Petitioner Vs1.The District Collector, Chennai District, Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai-600 001.
The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, Chennai-600 053.
The Assistant Engineer, PWD Water Resources Organization, Chennai-600 052.
Operative part
The Section Officer, PWD - Irrigation Division, Water Resources Organization, Senkundram, Chennai-52...RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to form-III in Notice No.960/P.A./ FILE-11/ dated 29.07.2024 of the 4th respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to follow the directions issued by this Honourable Court in T.S. Senthilkumar V. Government of Tamil Nadu and others reported in 2010(3) MLJ 771 for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25088 of 2024__________Page2 of 4proceedings under Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007.For Petitioner :Ms.A.RadhaFor Respondents :Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl. Govt. PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and she had also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.B.,J.) 30-03-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoDSA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25088 of 2024__________Page3 of 4To1.The District Collector, Chennai District, Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai-600 001.2.The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, Chennai-600 053.3.The Assistant Engineer, PWD Water Resources Organization, Chennai-600 052.4.The Section Officer, PWD - Irrigation Division, Water Resources Organization, Senkundram, Chennai-52. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25088 of 2024__________Page4 of 4S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.KUMARESH BABU, J.DSAWP No. 25088 of 202430-03-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.