✦ Madras High Court

G.Ramesh Babu v. State

P VELMURUGAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

22588 of 2024Petition is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Hence, this Criminal Original 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024 Petition is dismissed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.21.11.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation Case : Yes/NoSpeaking Order : Yes/NomsTo1.…

Judgment

Crl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.11.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGANCrl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024andCrl.M.P.Nos.12859 and 12860 of 2024G.Ramesh Babu ... PetitionerVs.

1.

State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Nagore Police Station, Nagapattinam, Crime No.313 of 2023.

2.

Devakumar ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, to call for the records in C.C.No.208 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagapattinam for offences under Section 153 A(1)(a), 295A, 189, 506(2), 505(2) IPC and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Krishnamurthy For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024

O R D E RThis Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.208 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagapattinam for the offences under Section 153 A(1)(a), 295A, 189, 506(2) and 505(2) IPC.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the first respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

3.

This Court perusing the charge sheet, statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 161(3) Cr.P.C., and other materials, finds that there are prima facie allegations made against the petitioner, it is a matter for trial and the points raised by the petitioner herein has to be agitated before the trial Court.

Operative part

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Hence, this Criminal Original 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024 Petition is dismissed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.21.11.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation Case : Yes/NoSpeaking Order : Yes/NomsTo1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagapattinam.2. The Inspector of Police, Nagore Police Station, Nagapattinam.3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024P.VELMURUGAN, JmsCrl.O.P.No.22588 of 2024andCrl.M.P.Nos.12859 and 12860 of 202421.11.20244/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: 22588 of 2024Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 161(3).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments