Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20.07.2017CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMYW.P.No.18409 of 2007 V.Palani ... Petitioner v. 1 The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road Pattinapakkam Chennai 600 0282 The District Registrar Chennai Central No.268, Bharathi Salai Express Estate, Royapettah Chennai 600 0143 The Sub Registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar Purasawalkam No.116, Perambur Barracks Road Chennai 600 0074 Malliga 5 Ganesan 6 Indhumathi 7 A.Marimuthu 8 M.Mythili ... Respondents http://www.judis.nic.in 2 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.05.2017 pertaining to the cancellation of the illegal registered Sale Deed in Document No.5294/2016, dated 7.11.2016 on the file of the 3rd respondent, within a stipulated time as fixed by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.SrinivasuFor Respondent : Mr.S.V.Doraisolaimalai Addl. Govt. PleaderORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 20.07.2017Rj http://www.judis.nic.in 3To 1 The Inspector General of Registration 100, Santhome High Road Pattinapakkam Chennai 600 0282 The District Registrar Chennai Central No.268, Bharathi Salai Express Estate, Royapettah Chennai 600 0143 The Sub Registrar Office of the Sub-Registrar Purasawalkam No.116, Perambur Barracks Road Chennai 600 007 http://www.judis.nic.in 4 M. DURAISWAMY,J.Rj W.P.No.18409 of 2017 20.07.2017
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.