✦ Madras High Court

Kalaiselvi, F/36 v. P.Senthil

3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P. No.797 of 2024 is allowed. H.M.O.P. No.63 of 2022 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi, is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam. The Subordinate 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.797 of 2024 Court, Kallakurichi, shall transmit the…

Judgment

Tr.C.M.P.No.797 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10.12.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETETr.C.M.P. No.797 of 2024andC.M.P.No.17600 of 2024 Kalaiselvi, F/36,W/o.P.Senthil,D/o.Rajamanikkam, No.252, Selliyamman Kovil Street, Thondankurichi, Thozhudhur Post, Tittagudi Taluk, Cuddalore District – 606304. ... PetitionerVsP.Senthil,S/o.Poomalai, No.2/11, East street,S.Ogaiyur Village and Post, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District – 606204. ... RespondentPRAYER in TR.CMP.No.797 of 2024: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to order to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.63 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge at Kallakurichi, Kallakurichi District and transfer the same to Principal Sub Court Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore District by appreciating the above said facts and 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.797 of 2024circumstances of the case and pass any such orders as this Court may deem fit and thus render justice.PRAYER in CMP.No.17600 of 2024: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to stay all further proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.63 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge at Kallakurichi, Kallakurichi District, pending disposal of the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Meganathan. For Respondent: Ms.V.Srimathi. ORDERHeard.

2.

This petition is filed by wife under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of H.M.O.P. No.63 of 2022 from the Principal Sub Court, Kallakurichi to the Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore district.

3.

The marriage between parties solemnized on 18.03.2013 and have two minor children. The petitioner–wife submits that the respondent earlier filed H.M.O.P. No.81 of 2018 for divorce at Kallakurichi. That proceeding was already transferred by this Court in Tr.C.M.P. No.380/2018 to the Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam, where it was renumbered as H.M.O.P. No.86/2018. During 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.797 of 2024those proceedings, the parties entered into an amicable settlement before the Lok Adalat on 08.02.2020, and the divorce petition was dismissed on settlement. Despite this settlement, the respondent did not resume matrimonial life, and instead initiated fresh divorce proceedings in H.M.O.P. No.63/2022 at Kallakurichi, causing the petitioner additional hardship.

4.

The petitioner resides with two minor children and is the sole caregiver for them and her aged parents. The distance to Kallakurichi is nearly 90 kilometres one way, involving multiple bus changes, causing serious difficulty and safety concerns. She also points out that the respondent is already attending M.C. No.14 of 2022 at Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Vriddhachalam, and therefore no prejudice will be caused to him if transfer is ordered.

5.

It is well-settled that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife must be given paramount consideration in such transfer requests. The earlier litigation history demonstrates that Vriddhachalam was the forum where the parties litigated matrimonial issues, including the settled 2018 divorce petition; in all fairness the prayer of the petitioner requires consideration.

6.

Accordingly, Tr.C.M.P. No.797 of 2024 is allowed. H.M.O.P. No.63 of 2022 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi, is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam. The Subordinate 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.797 of 2024 Court, Kallakurichi, shall transmit the entire records in H.M.O.P.No.63 of 2022 to the Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam, within three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam, shall thereafter proceed with the matter in accordance with law and dispose of it as expeditiously as possible, uninfluenced by any observations made in this order. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.17600 of 2024 stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 10.12.2025mfa/dnaIndex: Yes/NoNCC: Yes/NoSpeaking Order / Non-Speaking OrderTo1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Kallakurichi. 2. The Principal Sub Court, Vriddhachalam, Cuddalore. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.797 of 2024DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, Jmfa/dnaTr.C.M.P. No.797 of 2024andC.M.P.No.17600 of 2024 Dated: 10.12.20255/5

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments