✦ High Court of India · 08 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Oct 2025
Length
1,124 words

Arb Appln No. 869 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-10-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHArb Appln No. 869 of 2025IndusInd Bank Ltd.,Branch Office: MumbaiConsumer Finance Division rep by its Legal ExecutiveMr.Vasantha Rooban Abishek, I.J.No.34, G.N.Chetty RoadT.Nagar, Chennai 600 017 ApplicantVs1. Mrs.A.Selvi D/o Anbarasan2. Mr.Anbarasan S/o Dhanasekaran No.72, Ambedkar Street Sevilimedu, Kanchipuram 631 502 RespondentsPRAYERTo pass an order of appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize and deliver Motor Car Chassis No.MBHCZFB3SNM354596; Engine No.K12NP4175190, Registration No.TN21BR4795 to the custody of the applicant, available at the respondents premises or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found and permit the Advocate Commissioner to obtain Police aid and to break open the premises. For Applicant :Mr.RA.GopinathFor Respondents :Ms.Sri Gowri.UAdvocate CommissionerORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 869 of 2025This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for seizing the vehicle in the custody of the respondents, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises. 2. When this application came up for hearing on 02.07.2025, this Court passed the following order:-“This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, seeking for appointment of an advocate commissioner to repossess the vehicle from the respondents or wherever available.2. The applicant is a non banking financial institution. They lent money to the respondents under an agreement for loan dated 29.12.2022. The respondents have committed default in the repayment of the loan as per the said agreement. The applicant has also recalled the loan through their loan recall notice dated 09.04.2025. They have also filed a statement of accounts dated 25.06.2025. As seen from the same, Rs.5,08,407/- is due and payable by the respondents to the applicant. The said amount includes the future installments, penal interest and other incidental charges. However, as on date, the respondents are in arrears of installments, which amounts to Rs.66,939/-. 3. Under the agreement for loan dated 29.12.2022, the applicant is empowered to repossess the vehicle from the respondents in case they commit default in the repayment of the loan. The applicant has expressed its difficulties to repossess the vehicle on their own. Under those circumstances, they have filed this application, seeking for appointment of an advocate commissioner to repossess the vehicle. The applicant has also undertaken to initiate arbitration in accordance with clause 11 of the agreement for loan dated 29.12.2022. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 869 of 20254. This Court, after giving due consideration to the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of this application and after giving due consideration to the documents filed along with this application, is of the considered view that since the respondents are defaulters in the repayment of loan, this Court is inclined to appoint an advocate commissioner as prayed for in this application. However, in order to enable the respondents to run the vehicle even after repossession by the advocate commissioner, this Court is putting the respondents on terms. According to the applicant, a sum of Rs.66,939/- is due and payable by the respondents to the applicant towards arrears of installments i.e., five installments have not been paid by the respondents to the applicant till date. 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court issues the following directions: a) Ms. Sri Gowri U, Advocate having address at No.12/25, Muthiyal Street, Purasaiwalkam, Chennai - 600 007 (Mob. No.90436 33179) is appointed as the advocate commissioner to re-posses the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons from the respondents from their premises or wherever available; b) The advocate commissioner after re-possessing the vehicle, shall handover interim custody of the same to the applicant, who shall keep it in their safe custody; c) The advocate commissioner, immediately after re-possessing the subject vehicle, shall intimate the respondents either through Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due (RPAD) or by hand delivery through a written communication, that the arrears of installments works out to Rs.66,939/-; d) The respondents on payment of Rs.66,939/- to the applicant within a period of one week from the date when the subject vehicle was repossessed, is entitled for return of the seized vehicle, provided an undertaking is given by the respondents that they shall pay the future installments on the due dates, without any default. On receipt of the sum of Rs.66,939/- within the stipulated time as stated supra, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 869 of 2025applicant shall redeliver the subject vehicle back to the respondents with proper acknowledgment and the advocate commissioner shall also render proper assistance for the same; e) The applicant shall initiate arbitration in accordance with the arbitration agreement contained in the contract within a period of 90 days from today. In case, the applicant fails to initiate arbitration within the stipulated time, the order passed by this Court today shall stand automatically vacated and the re-possessed vehicle shall also be redelivered back to the respondents by the applicant unconditionally; f) In case, the advocate commissioner requires Police assistance due to any law and order problem or due to any obstruction caused by the respondents or by any third party, while re-possessing the vehicle, the advocate commissioner is at liberty to seek police assistance from the concerned police station and the police department shall grant police protection accordingly. In case, break open of the premises, where the vehicle is located, is required, the advocate commissioner shall break open the premises in the presence of the police and take an inventory and thereafter re-posses the vehicle; g) The advocate commissioner shall be paid an initial remuneration of Rs.25,000/- and on receipt of the same, the advocate commissioner shall proceed to execute this order. All the boarding, lodging and travelling expenses for the advocate commissioner shall be borne by the applicant. 6. Notice to the respondents, returnable by 06.08.2025. Private Notice is also permitted. ” 3. The private notice that was sent to the respondents has been duly served on the respondents and proof of service has also been filed. But the respondents are neither present nor represented through counsel. 4. The learned counsel for applicant submitted that the initial https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 869 of 2025remuneration has been paid to the learned Advocate Commissioner. 5. In view of the above, in the place of the Advocate Commissioner, Mr.Vasantha Rooban Abishek I.J., Legal Executive is appointed as Receiver for seizing the subject vehicle from the respondents or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required, with police aid. 6. This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 08-10-2025ssTo1. Mrs.A.Selvi D/o Anbarasan2. Mr.Anbarasan S/o Dhanasekaran No.72, Ambedkar Street Sevilimedu, Kanchipuram 631 502 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 869 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH J.ssArb Appln No. 869 of 2025 08-10-2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments