✦ Madras High Court

Velu v. State Represented byThe Inspector of Police

Case at a glance

Judgment

Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.07.2025CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMARCrl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025Velu ... Petitioner/A4Vs.State Represented byThe Inspector of Police, Kilkodunkalu Police Station, Tiruvannamalai (Crime No.115 of 2025) ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.115 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner:M/s.S.Elvin NihaFor Respondent:Mr.R.Vinoth RajaGovernment Advocate (Crl. Side)O R D E RThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.06.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 275, 123 of BNS Act [ Corresponding Section 273, 328 of IPC and Section 6(b), 24(1) of Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Acts, 2003 in Crime No.115 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025possession of 49 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence, the case.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case.5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025Rs.30,000/- [Rupees Thirty Thousand Only] as non-refundable deposit directly to the credit of “Sri Ramachandra University, Porur Branch, Sri Ramachandra University, Ramachandra Nagar, Porur, Chennai-600 116 in A/c.No.CA 6203243021, IFSC Code:IDIB000S180, Indian Bank, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court, on such deposit and production of proof, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, Tiruvannmalai and on further conditions that:[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;[c] the petitioner shall make himself available 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;[d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses;[e] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S04.07.20254/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025smaNote :1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.To1.The Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai.2.The Inspector of Police, Kilkodunkalu Police Station, Tiruvannamalai 3.The Sub Jail, Vandavasi4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.sma5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.19087 of 202504.07.20256/6

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments