✦ High Court of India · 03 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,122 words

Acts & Sections

W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANW.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024and W.M.P.Nos.24213, 24210, 24212, 24244, 24245 and 24247 of 20241. M/s.Aswathi Exports A Partnership Firm, Rep. by Managing Partner, C.Chandrasekaran, Having office at No.9/244-B, Ramana Industrial Garden, 15, Velampalayam Ring Road, Tiruppur 641 652.2. C.Chandrasekaran.. Petitioners in both WPs.-vs-1. The Board of Directors of Indian Bank, Rep. by its Managing Director, Corporate Office, PB No.5555, 254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.2. Indian Bank, Rep. by its Managing Director, Corporate Office, PB No.5555, 254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.Page 1 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 20243. Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, 83, Court Street, Tiruppur 641 601.4. Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises, Rep. by its Secretary, Udyog Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi, Delhi 110 001.5. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi 110 001.6. Reserve Bank of India, Rep. by its Governor, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai 400 001.7. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation, Chennai Branch, Overseas Towers, 3rd Floor, L-756-Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.8. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation, Coimbatore Branch, Cheran Plaza, 2nd Floor, 1090, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018. 9. The Board of Directors of Export Credit Guarantee Corporation, Coimbatore Branch, Cheran Plaza, 2nd Floor, 1090, Trichy Road, Coimbatore 641 018.Page 2 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 202410. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.11. R.Ramesh Kumar .. Respondents in both WPs.Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of (i) W.P.No.22232/2024 - Writ of Declaration (1) to declare that proviso 2 and 3 to Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act is unconstitutional and void; (2)To declare that the second proviso to Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act is only applicable in respect of any final order passed by the DRT in an application filed by a borrower under Section 17 of the Act and further that the words "not less than 25 percent of the debt" in the second proviso to Section 18, is unconstitutional inasmuch as it completely denudes the Chairperson of the DRAT of the discretion to exempt the borrower from making the pre-deposit even in deserving cases; 3)to declare that the MSME Act in so far as it has not created a special forum/tribunals to adjudicate the inter-se rights and obligations/remedies, which it has created in addition to those rights/obligations/remedies recognized by the common law, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is not ousted, for it is impossible to oust the jurisdiction of the Civil Court without providing for an alternative forum/tribunal to adjudicate the inter se disputes between parties who are governed by the Act; (4)to declare that Sections 5 and 6 of the SARFAESI Act of 2002 is unconstitutional and void in as much as it permits alienation of the properties of a secured debtor/borrower without notice him, nay, entirely behind his back, thus impinging Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution (ii) W.P.No.22253/2024 - Writ of Declaration (1) To declare that the Petitioner being an MSME within the meaning of the MSMED Act of 2006 and notification dated 29.05.2015 issued by the Central Government under Section 9 thereof, as also the circulars and guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India under Section 10 thereof, which provides for a mechanism of resolution of stress no proceedings for recovery under the SARFAESI Act RDB Act, IBC, will lie except in the manner contemplated under the said Page 3 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024notification in particular Paragraph 5(4)(iii) of the same; (2) Writ of Certiorari - call for the entire records and proceedings at the hands of the Authorized Officer u/s 13(2) 13(4) and the Magistrate under 14 of the SARFAESI Act and to quash and set aside the same being without jurisdiction, in violation of fundamental principles of judicial procedure and most importantly, being in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution; (3) Writ of Declaration to declare the entire proceedings at the hands of the Respondent Nos.3, Authorised Officers of the Indian Bank, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur, under Sections 5, 6, 13(2), 13(4) and 14 of the SARFAESI, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, are illegal and void; (4) Writ of Mandamus to direct respondent No.1, Board of Directors of the Indian Bank to the petitioner company, an MSME, as contemplated in paragraph 2 of the notification dated 29.5.2015 issued under the MSMED Act, and further to direct the Committee to resolve the stress in accordance with the said notification and such other relevant notifications/regulations framed by the RBI; (5) Writ of Certiorari to quash the entire proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and restore possession of the properties, nay, put the clock back and restructure the account of the petitioner and compensate him to the fullest extent of the loss suffered.For Petitionersin both petitions:Ms.Amul Ranifor Mr.Maria NedumparaFor Respondentsin both petitions : Ms.N.Varshafor M/s.Aiyar and Dolia for RR 1 to 3:Mr.Prasad Vijayakumarfor RR4 and 5:Mr.T.Poornam for R-6:Mr.Surya Teja SS Nallafor RR 7 to 9:Mr.Karthik JegannathGovt. Advocate for R-10:Not ready in notice reg. R-11Page 4 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024* * * * *Page 5 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024COMMON ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Ms.Amul Rani states that the matter is settled and seeks leave to withdraw the writ petitions.The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. W.M.P.Nos.24210 and 24244 of 2024, filed by petitioners seeking permission to join and file a single writ petition, stand allowed. Consequently, the other interim applications stand closed. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDERMOHAN,J.)03.06.2025Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NosraPage 6 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024To1. The Managing Director, The Board of Directors of Indian Bank, Corporate Office, P.B.No.5555, 254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.2. The Managing Director, Indian Bank, Corporate Office, P.B.No.5555, 254-260, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.3. The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank, 83, Court Street, Tiruppur 641 601.4. The Secretary, Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises, Udyog Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi, Delhi 110 001.5. The Secretary to Union of India, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi 110 001.6. The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Fort, Mumbai 400 001.7. The Chief Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.Page 7 of 8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 2024The Hon'ble Chief Justiceand Sunder Mohan, J. (sra) W.P.Nos.22232 and 22253 of 202403.06.2025Page 8 of 8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments