✦ Madras High Court

Writ Petition No. 3606 of 2012 · Madras High Court

Writ Petition No. 3606 of 2012M JAICHANDRENWRIT

Case at a glance

Bench
M JAICHANDRENWRIT

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE: 23-2-2012CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENWrit Petition No.3606 of 2012 andM.P.No.1 of 2012V.G.P.Pushpa Nagar Residents' Welfare Association, Rep. By its Secretary,P.Venugopal, Plot No.15, Shanthi Street,V.G.P.Pushpa Nagar, Medavakkam, Chennai-600 100... Petitioner. Versus1. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

2.

The Tamil Nadu State MarketingCorporation Ltd. (TASMAC),Rep. By its Senior Regional Manager, Chennai-600 002.

3.

The Tamil Nadu State MarketingCorporation Ltd. (TASMAC),Rep. By its Senior Regional Manager, Kancheepuram District, Chennai-600 002... Respondents. Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from locating the TASMAC Wine Shop No.4385 at Plot No.8, V.G.P.PushpaNagar, Medavakkam, Chennai-600 100. For Petitioner : Mr.K.SelvarajFor Respondents : Mr.M.L.Mahendran Government Advocate (R1) Mr.S.Muthu Raj (TASMAC) (R2 & R3)

O R D E RHeard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that the proposal to locate the Tamilnadu State Marketing CorporationShop No.4385 at Plot No.8, V.G.P.Pushpa Nagar, Medavakkam, Chennai, had been dropped based on the request made by the petitionerAssociation, as well as the members of the general public, and based on the adverse report submitted by the police officers concerned, stating that the location of the Tamilnadu State MarketingCorporation Shop in the locality concerned, is likely to cause law and order problems. 3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents, since, no further orders are necessary, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Csh Sd/ Assistant Registrar/True Copy/ Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 2. The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State MarketingCorporation Ltd. (TASMAC),Chennai-600 002.3.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State MarketingCorporation Ltd. (TASMAC),Kancheepuram District, Chennai-600 002.+1cc to Mr.S.Muthu Raj Advocate Sr.12453+1cc to Mr.K.Selvaraj Advocate Sr.12381+1cc to Government Advocate Sr.12833Writ Petition No.3606 of 2012RK(CO)rvr 19/03/2012

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3606 of 2012). ← Search more judgments