✦ High Court of India · 26 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Jun 2025
Length
1,170 words

Cited in this judgment

W.P.No.23032 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.23032 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.25874 and 25875 of 20251.R. Sarasu2.R. Nagaraj3.R. Nagaiah4.R. Selvaraj5.S. Pranavam6.M. Malarvizhi7.A. Kumari8.A. Ragu9.A. Oliyullah10.R. SivaPetitionersvs.1.The Deputy SecretaryRevenue and Disaster Management DepartmentSurvey and SettlementSS-1(1) SectionSecretariatChennai 600 009Page Nos.1/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 20252.The Commissioner for Land AdministrationEzhilagamChetpetChennai 600 0053.The District CollectorThiruvallur CollectorateThiruvallur District 602 0014.The District Revenue OfficerThiruvallur District Revenue OfficeThiruvallur 602 0015.The TahsildarPonneri Tahsildar OfficePonneri 600 0606.The Commissioner of PoliceAvadi Police CommissionerateAvadiChennai 600 0627.The Inspector of PoliceE-5 Sholavaram Police StationRedhillsChennai 600 067RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the order passed by the third respondent-Collector in Na.Ka.No.3382599/2025/Aa3 dated 11.06.2025 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to issue patta to the petitioners in Survey No.561/2, Sholavaram Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District.Page Nos.2/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025For petitionersMr. K. BharathiFor RR 1 to 5Mr. T.K. SaravananAddl. Govt. PleaderFor RR 6 & 7Mr. S. SanthoshGovt. Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDER[made by M. SUNDAR, J.]Captioned main 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer for issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus.2.Mr. K. Bharathi, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, adverting to the impugned order, wanted to make submissions on merits of the impugned order and learned counsel pointed out that writ petitioners' request for issue of patta has to be considered.3.Issue notice to respondents.4.Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for RR 1 to 5 and Mr. S. Santhosh, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), accepts notice for RR 6 and 7. Page Nos.3/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 20255.The entire matter turns on a short point of alternative remedy as an efficacious and effective alternative remedy is available qua impugned order by way of a revision under Section 10-A of 'the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 [Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' (hereinafter 'said 1905 Act' for the sake of brevity].6.Alternative Remedy rule is a rule of discretion and is not an absolute rule. Be that as it may, before proceeding further, it is deemed appropriate to write that this Court, in order dated 29.04.2025 in W.P.Nos.8355 and 8357 of 2022 and W.M.P. Nos.8324 and 8237 of 2022 thereat, respectfully adverting to the Girnar principle, i.e., declaration of law made by a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Girnar Traders (3) vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2011) 3 SCC 1, held that said 1905 Act is a self-contained Code. To be noted, Girnar principle is one where Hon'ble Supreme Court declared the law as regards what would be a self-contained Code. It was held that a statute, which is a complete legislation with regard to the purpose for which it is enacted and provides for complete machinery to deal with purposes sought to be Page Nos.4/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025achieved by the statute with dependence on other legislations being absent or at best minimal, is a self-contained Code.7.In this context, as regards said 1905 Act, inter alia, there is a provision to have the alleged encroacher show caused under Section 7 of said 1905 Act followed by an order (considering the cause shown). The order under Section 6 is appealable under Section 10 [District Collector is the appellate authority] and there is a provision for further revision to the Government under Section 10-A of said 1905 Act. Pending appeal / revision, there is a provision for making interim prayer vide Section 10-B of said 1905 Act. Such a three-tier machinery has been put in place to check unauthorised occupation of lands which are the properties of the Government by imposition of penal or prohibitory assessment or charge, after giving adequate and ample opportunity to a person who is alleged to be in occupation of public roads, streets, lanes and paths, bridges, ditches, dikes and fences, rivers, streams, nalas, lakes, tanks and such other properties of Government. Suffice to say that said 1905 Act is clearly a self-contained Code.Page Nos.5/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 20258.In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned main WP stands vastly descoped and therefore, with the consent of the aforementioned learned counsel, captioned main WP was taken up.9.The following order is made:i.It is open to the writ petitioners to file a statutory revision under Section 10-A of said 1905 Act assailing the impugned order of R3 dated 11.06.2025 bearing reference Na.Ka.No.3382599/2025/Aa3;ii.The impugned order of R3 has been served on the writ petitioners on 20.06.2025. This means that the writ petitioners have time till 20.07.2025 to prefer revision (this is vide sub-section (2) of Section 11 of said 1905 Act);iii.As writ petitioners have time till 20.07.2025 to prefer revision, coercive action, if at all and if that be so, shall be kept in abeyance till 20.07.2025;iv.Notwithstanding the above directive, it is open to the writ petitioners to seek interim stay pending revision before the revisional authority by resorting to Section 10-B of said 1905 Act;Page Nos.6/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025v.The stay petition shall be disposed of by the revisional authority within four weeks from the date of filing of the revision petition and stay petition;vi.Though obvious, we make it clear that if the writ petitioners file a revision under Section 10-A together with stay petition under Section 10-B of said 1905 Act, there will be no coercive action till disposal of the stay petition one way or the other within the aforereferred four weeks time frame;vii.If the stay petition disposal is in favour of the writ petitioners, the main revision will proceed;viii.If the stay petition disposal is adverse to the writ petitioners, the order in the stay petition will be kept in abeyance for a fortnight to enable the writ petitioners to seek judicial review, if so advised and if so desired;ix.Though obvious, we make it clear that if the writ petitioners do not prefer revision on or before 20.07.2025, the impugned order will get resuscitated and the impugned order can be put in motion by the State for carrying the same to its logical end.Page Nos.7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 202510.Captioned main WP stands disposed of in the aforesaid manner. In the light of the aforesaid directives, stay WMP being W.M.P.No.25874 of 2025 has become otiose and the same is disposed of as closed. W.M.P.No.25875 of 2025 is disposed of as closed but all rights and contentions of writ petitioners are left open to be canvassed in the revision, if so advised and if so desired. There shall be no order as to costs.(M.S., J.) (H.C., J.) 26.06.2025cadIndex:Yes/NoN.C.:Yes/NoPage Nos.8/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025To1.The Deputy SecretaryRevenue and Disaster Management DepartmentSurvey and SettlementSS-1(1) SectionSecretariatChennai 600 0092.The Commissioner for Land AdministrationEzhilagamChetpetChennai 600 0053.The District CollectorThiruvallur CollectorateThiruvallur District 602 0014.The District Revenue OfficerThiruvallur District Revenue OfficeThiruvallur 602 0015.The TahsildarPonneri Tahsildar OfficePonneri 600 0606.The Commissioner of PoliceAvadi Police CommissionerateAvadeChennai 600 0627.The Inspector of PoliceE-5 Sholavaram Police StationRedhillsChennai 600 067Page Nos.9/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025M.SUNDAR, J.andHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.cadW.P.No.23032 of 202526.06.2025Page Nos.10/10

W.P.No.23032 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.23032 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos.25874 and 25875 of 20251.R. Sarasu2.R. Nagaraj3.R. Nagaiah4.R. Selvaraj5.S. Pranavam6.M. Malarvizhi7.A. Kumari8.A. Ragu9.A. Oliyullah10.R. SivaPetitionersvs.1.The Deputy SecretaryRevenue and Disaster Management DepartmentSurvey and SettlementSS-1(1) SectionSecretariatChennai 600 009Page Nos.1/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 20252.The Commissioner for Land AdministrationEzhilagamChetpetChennai 600 0053.The District CollectorThiruvallur CollectorateThiruvallur District 602 0014.The District Revenue OfficerThiruvallur District Revenue OfficeThiruvallur 602 0015.The TahsildarPonneri Tahsildar OfficePonneri 600 0606.The Commissioner of PoliceAvadi Police CommissionerateAvadiChennai 600 0627.The Inspector of PoliceE-5 Sholavaram Police StationRedhillsChennai 600 067RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the order passed by the third respondent-Collector in Na.Ka.No.3382599/2025/Aa3 dated 11.06.2025 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to issue patta to the petitioners in Survey No.561/2, Sholavaram Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District.Page Nos.2/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025For petitionersMr. K. BharathiFor RR 1 to 5Mr. T.K. SaravananAddl. Govt. PleaderFor RR 6 & 7Mr. S. SanthoshGovt. Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDER[made by M. SUNDAR, J.]Captioned main 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer for issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus.2.Mr. K. Bharathi, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, adverting to the impugned order, wanted to make submissions on merits of the impugned order and learned counsel pointed out that writ petitioners' request for issue of patta has to be considered.3.Issue notice to respondents.4.Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for RR 1 to 5 and Mr. S. Santhosh, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), accepts notice for RR 6 and 7. Page Nos.3/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 20255.The entire matter turns on a short point of alternative remedy as an efficacious and effective alternative remedy is available qua impugned order by way of a revision under Section 10-A of 'the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 [Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' (hereinafter 'said 1905 Act' for the sake of brevity].6.Alternative Remedy rule is a rule of discretion and is not an absolute rule. Be that as it may, before proceeding further, it is deemed appropriate to write that this Court, in order dated 29.04.2025 in W.P.Nos.8355 and 8357 of 2022 and W.M.P. Nos.8324 and 8237 of 2022 thereat, respectfully adverting to the Girnar principle, i.e., declaration of law made by a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Girnar Traders (3) vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2011) 3 SCC 1, held that said 1905 Act is a self-contained Code. To be noted, Girnar principle is one where Hon'ble Supreme Court declared the law as regards what would be a self-contained Code. It was held that a statute, which is a complete legislation with regard to the purpose for which it is enacted and provides for complete machinery to deal with purposes sought to be Page Nos.4/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025achieved by the statute with dependence on other legislations being absent or at best minimal, is a self-contained Code.7.In this context, as regards said 1905 Act, inter alia, there is a provision to have the alleged encroacher show caused under Section 7 of said 1905 Act followed by an order (considering the cause shown). The order under Section 6 is appealable under Section 10 [District Collector is the appellate authority] and there is a provision for further revision to the Government under Section 10-A of said 1905 Act. Pending appeal / revision, there is a provision for making interim prayer vide Section 10-B of said 1905 Act. Such a three-tier machinery has been put in place to check unauthorised occupation of lands which are the properties of the Government by imposition of penal or prohibitory assessment or charge, after giving adequate and ample opportunity to a person who is alleged to be in occupation of public roads, streets, lanes and paths, bridges, ditches, dikes and fences, rivers, streams, nalas, lakes, tanks and such other properties of Government. Suffice to say that said 1905 Act is clearly a self-contained Code.Page Nos.5/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 20258.In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned main WP stands vastly descoped and therefore, with the consent of the aforementioned learned counsel, captioned main WP was taken up.9.The following order is made:i.It is open to the writ petitioners to file a statutory revision under Section 10-A of said 1905 Act assailing the impugned order of R3 dated 11.06.2025 bearing reference Na.Ka.No.3382599/2025/Aa3;ii.The impugned order of R3 has been served on the writ petitioners on 20.06.2025. This means that the writ petitioners have time till 20.07.2025 to prefer revision (this is vide sub-section (2) of Section 11 of said 1905 Act);iii.As writ petitioners have time till 20.07.2025 to prefer revision, coercive action, if at all and if that be so, shall be kept in abeyance till 20.07.2025;iv.Notwithstanding the above directive, it is open to the writ petitioners to seek interim stay pending revision before the revisional authority by resorting to Section 10-B of said 1905 Act;Page Nos.6/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025v.The stay petition shall be disposed of by the revisional authority within four weeks from the date of filing of the revision petition and stay petition;vi.Though obvious, we make it clear that if the writ petitioners file a revision under Section 10-A together with stay petition under Section 10-B of said 1905 Act, there will be no coercive action till disposal of the stay petition one way or the other within the aforereferred four weeks time frame;vii.If the stay petition disposal is in favour of the writ petitioners, the main revision will proceed;viii.If the stay petition disposal is adverse to the writ petitioners, the order in the stay petition will be kept in abeyance for a fortnight to enable the writ petitioners to seek judicial review, if so advised and if so desired;ix.Though obvious, we make it clear that if the writ petitioners do not prefer revision on or before 20.07.2025, the impugned order will get resuscitated and the impugned order can be put in motion by the State for carrying the same to its logical end.Page Nos.7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 202510.Captioned main WP stands disposed of in the aforesaid manner. In the light of the aforesaid directives, stay WMP being W.M.P.No.25874 of 2025 has become otiose and the same is disposed of as closed. W.M.P.No.25875 of 2025 is disposed of as closed but all rights and contentions of writ petitioners are left open to be canvassed in the revision, if so advised and if so desired. There shall be no order as to costs.(M.S., J.) (H.C., J.) 26.06.2025cadIndex:Yes/NoN.C.:Yes/NoPage Nos.8/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025To1.The Deputy SecretaryRevenue and Disaster Management DepartmentSurvey and SettlementSS-1(1) SectionSecretariatChennai 600 0092.The Commissioner for Land AdministrationEzhilagamChetpetChennai 600 0053.The District CollectorThiruvallur CollectorateThiruvallur District 602 0014.The District Revenue OfficerThiruvallur District Revenue OfficeThiruvallur 602 0015.The TahsildarPonneri Tahsildar OfficePonneri 600 0606.The Commissioner of PoliceAvadi Police CommissionerateAvadeChennai 600 0627.The Inspector of PoliceE-5 Sholavaram Police StationRedhillsChennai 600 067Page Nos.9/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23032 of 2025M.SUNDAR, J.andHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.cadW.P.No.23032 of 202526.06.2025Page Nos.10/10

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments