M/s.Linux Laboratories Private LimitedRep. by its Director Mr.S.Ananda KumarNo.492 v. Ms Univentis Medicare Limited

162 of 2025__________Page3 of 6deceptively similar/almost identical to the plaintiff’s registered trademark EPITRAZ amounting to an infringement of the plaintiff’s registered trademark EPITRAZ bearing Registration No.2810474 in Class 05 in any manner whatsoever. b) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendants their partners, their employees, officiers, servants, agents, and all other acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, distributing, exporting, advertising, offering for sale, any products, maintain and/or operate websites, domain names, social media platforms, email address, mobile applications trade/corporate name and in any other manner, directly or indirectly, online or off line, dealing with any goods or services in the name of EPITIRA or any other trademark which is deceptively similar/almost identical to the plaintiff’s registered trademark EPITRA and such other marks and passing off the goods/services of the defendants as and for those of the plaintiff in any manner whatsoever.c) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendants their partners, their employees, officiers, servants, agents, and all other acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, distributing, exporting, advertising, offering for sale, any products, maintain and/or operate websites, domain names, social media platforms, email address, mobile applications trade/corporate name and in any other manner, directly or indirectly, online or off line, dealing with any goods or services in the name of EPITIRA or any other trademark which is almost identical/deceptively similar/almost identical to the plaintiff’s trademarks EPITRA/EPITRAZ amounting to unfair competition, dilution of the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark or doing any other thing which will lead to dilution of plaintiff’s intellectual properties.d) the Defendants be ordered to pay to the plaintiff a sum of INR30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Only) as damages for having committed infringement of the plaintiff’s registered trademark and passing off in respect of the plaintiff’s trademark EPITRA/EPITRA and its formative marks. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S(COMM DIV) No.

162 of 2025__________Page4 of 6e) A preliminary decree be passed in favor of the plaintiff directing the defendants to render true and proper accounts of the profits arising out of the amount of sales generated by the defendant in respect of their alleged activities bearing the trademark EPITIRA or any mark which is almost identical/deceptively similar and/or identical to the plaintiff’s trademarks EPITRA/EPITRAZ in any manner whatsoever.f) Directing the defendants for delivery up of any brochures/printed material and/or any material bearing the trademark EPITIRA which infringes the plaintiff’s registered trademark EPTIRAZ.For Plaintiff(s) :Mr.Aaryyan Aathreyafor Mr.M.S.BharathFor Respondent(s) :Mr.Krishna Sumanth (D1 to D3)Mr.Karthik Selvaraj (D4)J U D G M E N TWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on either side would submit in unison that the parties to the suit have settled the dispute among themselves and to that effect, have also filed a Settlement Agreement signed by both the plaintiff and the defendants.