✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 17.06.2024 and pass appropriate orders on the petitioners' representation 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.20002 of 2024on merits and in accordance with law, after…

Judgment

WP.No.20002 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.07.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMARWP.No.20002 of 20241.A.Sharmila2.T.Shakespeare3.Helen .. PetitionersVersus1.The District CollectorCollector Office, Villupuram, Villupuram District2.The TahsildarGingee Taluk, Villupuram District .. RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner' online application dated 17.06.2024 for issue of sub-division patta and name transfer of the petitioners for the properties more fully described in the schedule to the writ petition. For Petitioners : Mr.T.RamachandranFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.20002 of 2024ORDERThis writ petition is filed for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners' online application dated 17.06.2024 for issue of sub-division patta and name transfer of the petitioners for the properties more fully described in the schedule to the writ petition.

2.

The petitioners submitted an application on 17.06.2024 with a request for surveying the petitioner's property and name transfer, which is pending without consideration. Hence, this writ petition.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

4.

By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

Operative part

5.

Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 17.06.2024 and pass appropriate orders on the petitioners' representation 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.20002 of 2024on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners and any other interested persons. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 24.07.2024dhkIndex: Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoTo1.The District CollectorCollector Office, Villupuram, Villupuram District2.The TahsildarGingee Taluk, Villupuram District 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.20002 of 2024N. SATHISH KUMAR , J. dhkW.P.No.20002 of 202424.07.20244/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments