PalanivelS/o.AnandhanNo.75 v. The State
Case at a glance
- Bench
- C KUMARAPPAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482
- Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 ss. 4(1)(A), 4(1)(i), 14(A)
- Amendment Act, 2024
Judgment
CRL OP No. 14165 of 2026__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPANCRL OP No. 14165 of 2026 PalanivelS/o.AnandhanNo.75, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Ariyur, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu 605751...Petitioner(s)VsThe State rep.by, Inspector of Police, Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. Tamilnadu-636810...Respondent(s)PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of the petitioner in Cr.No.167 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police station. For Petitioner(s):M/s.Bharathi GFor Respondent(s):Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 4(1)(i), 4(1)(A) and 14(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 (as amended by the Amendment Act, 2024), in Crime No.167 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.
14165 of 2026__________Page2 of 42. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was found in illegal possession of 40 bottles of brandy each containing 180 ml. Hence the case.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has six previous cases. He further submitted that if the petitioner is enlarged on anticipatory bail, he may abscond and commit similar offences in the future. Hence, he vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner and the fact that the case involves a prohibition offence, which has serious effect on society, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.6.
Operative part
Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.05-06-2026GBI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14165 of 2026__________Page3 of 4To1.Inspector of Police, Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. Tamilnadu-636810.2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14165 of 2026__________Page4 of 4C.KUMARAPPAN, J.GBICRL OP No. 14165 of 202605-06-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 — ss. 4(1)(A), 4(1)(i), 14(A); Amendment Act, 2024.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.