✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

V BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kayaroganaswamy and Neelayatachiamman Thirukovil, Nagapattinam – 611 001. ....RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent…

Judgment

W.P. No.18570 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED:23.07.2024CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYANW.P.No.18570 of 2024andWMP No.20359 and 20361 of 2024 T. Vairamoorthy....Petitioner ..Vs..

1.

The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dept. Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

2.

The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dept. Neela South Street, Nagapattinam – 611 001.

3.

The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dept. Nagapattinam – 611 001.

4.

The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kayaroganaswamy and Neelayatachiamman Thirukovil, Nagapattinam – 611 001. ....RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in Pa. Ma.No.111/2023/E2 dated 1.2.2024 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.18570 of 2024consequential order of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.1139/20233/E1 dated 24.6.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to provide opportunity of hearing and pass orders accordingly. For petitioner : Mr. P. Kannan Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K. Karthikeyan (Govt. Advocate)***** ORDER This Writ petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in Pa.Ma.No.111/2023, dated 13.06.2024 and consequential order of the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.1139/20233/E1, dated 24.06.2024 and quash the same and consequently, direct the 1st respondent to dispose the petitioner's revision dated 01.04.2024 as expeditiously as possible.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the rent has been enhanced in a retrospective manner (from six years back) in an unilateral method by way of arbitrary proceedings without issuing any notice to the petitioner. The petitioner has filed a revision challenging the order in Pa.No.111/2023/E2 dated 01.02.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent, before the 1st respondent. Pending the aforesaid revision, the 2nd respondent has passed the order in Pa.Ma.No.111/2023 dated 13.06.2024 and 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.18570 of 2024consequential order in Na.Ka.No.1139/20233/E1, dated 24.06.2024 has been passed by the 3rd respondent directing to evict the petitioner on 11.07.2024. While the out come of the Revision is pending before the 1st respondent, the orders of the respondents 2 and 3 to evict the petitioner on 11.07.2024 are against the Law and liable to be set aside. Hence, the petitioner seeks relief as prayed for.

3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has not paid rent properly and arrears of rent is to be paid upto Rs.12,92,005/- till 30.06.2024. Despite various notices with regard to pending of arrears of rent have been sent to the petitioner, he has not complied with the same. On enquiry with the 2nd respondent, the petitioner has failed to pay the arrears of rent. Hence, the respondents 2 and 3 have passed the orders to evict the petitioner from the premises belongs to the Temple. Hence, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is unsustainable and liable to be dismissed. 4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.18570 of 20245. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by both side counsel, it seems that the petitioner being the tenant of the temple premises, has to pay the rent properly.

However, he has failed to pay arrears of rent as fixed by the respondents even though he was called upon by the 2nd respondent in this regard. Under such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the orders passed by the respondents herein. Hence, the petitioner is hereby directed to pay the arrears of rent of Rs.12,92,005/- which is said to be paid by the petitioner till 30.06.2024, on or before 23.08.2024 failing which the respondents are at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in the manner know to law. 6. In view of the above direction, the Writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 23.07.2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoLbm4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.18570 of 2024ToThe Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dept. Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dept.

Neela South Street, Nagapattinam – 611 001.3. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Dept. Nagapattinam – 611 001.4. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kayaroganaswamy and Neelayatachiamman Thirukovil, Nagapattinam – 611 0015 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.18570 of 2024V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J., LbmW.P.No.18570 of 2024andWMP No.20359 and 20361 of 2024 23.07.20246

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments