✦ Madras High Court

SUN PROPERTIES v. C.Subramanian

G ARUL MURUGAN, CHIEF JUSTICEAND G ARUL MURUGAN2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With this liberty, the revision petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Annapoorni RameshNo.34-1, Eareekaadu, Meyanoor, Alagapuram, Salem 636 004.:RespondentsPrayer: Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue direction to the Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore, to dispose the SA.No.363 of 2024 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal…

Judgment

CRP No.3888 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 20.07.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANCRP No.3888 of 2026SUN PROPERTIES Rep. by its Proprietrix S.Maheswari, No.365, Maragatham Complex, Trichy Road, Sulur, Coimbatore 641 402. :PetitionerVersus1.C.Subramanian Residing at 48A,Sanjeeviyur, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501.

2.

M/s. TMB BankElampillai Branch, Rep. by its Manager, No.936/2B, Mettur Road, Near Bus Stand, Ellampillai 637 502.

3.

M/s. Kandasamy Coconut MandyRep. by its Proprietor Manikandan,14/312, Sanjeeviyur, Surapalli Village, Nangavalli Block, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501. Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 20264. K.Manikandan14/312, Sanjeeviyur, Surapalli Village, Nangavalli Block, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501.

5.

Dhanalakshmi ArunkumarNo.5/100, Kezhaku Kattuvalavu, Kamalapuram, Salem 636 309.

6.

Sumathi14/312, Sanjeeviyur, Surapalli Village, Nangavalli Block, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501.

Operative part

7.

Annapoorni RameshNo.34-1, Eareekaadu, Meyanoor, Alagapuram, Salem 636 004.:RespondentsPrayer: Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue direction to the Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore, to dispose the SA.No.363 of 2024 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, at Coimbatore within a time frame. For Petitioner: Mr.A.ManojkumarPage 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)This revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore, to dispose the S.A.No.363 of 2024 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, at Coimbatore within a time frame.2. We have gone through the order sheets placed on record and find that the case is progressing. Any direction to expedite a specific case out of turn would disrupt the board of the Tribunal. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstance that distinguishes its case from other litigants waiting in queue before the Tribunal. The Tribunal should prioritize cases based on their seniority, nature of urgency and statutory mandate. It is empowered to regulate its procedure and accelerate hearings if a genuine case of urgency is made out. Issuing blanket direction for quick disposal would put undue pressure on the Tribunal and, consequently, the persons who approached the Tribunal earlier would be left at a disadvantaged position. Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 20263. We are, therefore, not inclined to give such a direction to decide the case within a time frame. However, the petitioner would get liberty to file appropriate application before the Tribunal to expedite the hearing.4. With this liberty, the revision petition stands disposed of. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)20.07.2026Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NotarPage 4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026ToThe Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal, CoimbatorePage 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J. (tar) CRP No.3888 of 202620.07.2026Page 6 of 6

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With this liberty, the revision petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments