✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

M NIRMALKUMAR

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for.22.08.2024nv(Note to Office: Registry is directed to number the criminal revision case, if it is otherwise in order.)

Judgment

Crl. M.P. No. 9770 of 2024inCrl.R.C.SR. No. 31266 of 2024M. NIRMALKUMAR,J.The above criminal miscellaneous petition is filed to condone the delay of 185 days in preferring the criminal revision case.

2.

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

3.

Though Mr.C.D. Sugumar, learned counsel for the respondent expressed objection in the delay being condoned, this Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal miscellaneous petition.

4.

Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered as prayed for.22.08.2024nv(Note to Office: Registry is directed to number the criminal revision case, if it is otherwise in order.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments