R. Pongiannan (died) v. M. Eswaran (died)
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
on either side, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the Memorandum of Compromise entered into between the parties and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 14.11.2015. The terms of compromise shall form part…
Judgment
: Mr.V.P. Sengottuvel For Appellants For R.3 to R.6 : Ms.P.T. Ramadevi R.1 R.2 : Died – steps taken : Died
O R D E R Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated
30.01.2002 made in O.S.No.33 of 1994 on the file of Subordinate Court, Sankakiri.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on either side submitted that the parties have settled the matter out of Court and entered into a Memorandum of Compromise dated
14.11.2015. The learned counsel on either side submitted that the second respondent had died on 31.01.2006 and her legal representatives were already brought on record as the respondents 3 to 6 and the respondents 3 to 6 have signed the Memorandum of Compromise dated 14.11.2015.
The learned counsel on either side submitted that since the second respondent had died, as per the terms of compromise, the respondents 3 to 6, being the legal representatives of the deceased 3 first respondent, may be permitted receive the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only), now lying to the credit of E.P.No.20/2003 in O.S.No.33/1994 on the file of Sub Court, Namakkal towards full and final settlement of the claim in the above said suit and that they are not entitled to claim any further amount from the appellants.
Operative part
In view of the Memorandum of Compromise entered into between the parties and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 14.11.2015. The terms of compromise shall form part of the decree in the Appeal in A.S.No.42/2003. No costs. 05-08-2016 Index:no website:yes Note: Registry is directed to issue copy of the Judgment and Decree in two weeks time To The Subordinate Court, Sankakiri. 4 M. DURAISWAMY,J., A.S.No.42 of 2003 05-08-2016
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: on either side, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 05 Aug 2016. The bench was M DURAISWAMY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.