✦ High Court of India · 05 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,004 words

Acts & Sections

W.P.No.20059 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 05.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.20059 of 2025 &W.M.P.No.22618 of 2025M/s.AGN Cargo Movers Private Limited,represented by its Director G.Balaji,No.36/43 Bharathiyar Street,Veerapuram, Chengalpattu-603 002.... Petitioner Vs.The Superintendent,Chengalpattu Range,Office of the Superintendent of GST,Varadharaja Nagar, Ammanambakkam,Chengalpattu-603 001.... RespondentPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in Reference Number:ZA330324048153Z, quash the order dated 11.03.2024 passed therein and further direct the respondent to restore and activate the registration of the petitioner in GSTIN/UIN/33AARCA9067F1ZD.1/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.SudakarFor Respondent : Mr.S.Gurumoorthy Senior Standing CounselORDERThe challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 11.03.2024 passed by the respondent, cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner. 2. Mr.S.Gurumoorthy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent.3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is a registered tax payer under the GST enactments and they have been filing the GST returns regularly upto financial year 2022-23, however, due to slowdown in the business of the petitioner, many 2/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025employees left the service of the petitioner, as a result, the Petitioner could not file its returns for the continuous period of 6 months. Consequently, the respondent issued a show cause notice on 05.02.2024, proposing the cancellation of the GST registration for non-filing of returns for a continuous period of six months, and subsequently passing an order of cancellation on 11.03.2024. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the show cause was uploaded in the GST portal, without serving physical copy of the same to the petitioner, the petitioner was not aware of the same and hence could not file its reply, which resulted in passing of the impugned order. Thereafter, with a view to restart the business, the petitioner has filed the monthly returns upto the date of cancellation of the GST registration. However, since the GST registration was cancelled the petitioner is unable to restart its business. That apart the time limit for filing an application for revocation of cancellation and for filing appeal have also expired. He therefore prays to set aside the impugned order and direct the respondent to restore and activate the GST registration of the petitioner. 3/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025 5. On the other hand, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner did not file returns for a continuous period of six months, which led to the passing of the impugned order. He further submitted that the revocation of the cancellation of registration will be considered only upon payment of all dues and filing of all returns. 6. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 7. Admittedly, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled due to non-compliance in filing returns. Furthermore, the time limit for filing an application for revocation of the cancellation and also for filing statutory appeal against the cancellation order had also expired, and the petitioner stated that due to slowdown in the business of the Petitioner, they could not pay GST dues and file the returns. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the reason provided by the petitioner for 4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025non-compliance with the relevant provisions of the Act within the stipulated time appears to be genuine. 8. In view of the above, restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the following conditions : (i) The impugned order dated 11.03.2024 is set aside subject to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the Principal Government Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital, Account No.7883022723, IFSC Code: IDIB000M157, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount.(ii) Upon production of proof with regard to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- as stated above, the respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and 5/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (iii) The petitioner is directed to file returns for the period till date, if not filed, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of 4 weeks from the date of restoration of GST Registration of the petitioner.(iv) It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine/fee etc., shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit (ITC) which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. (v) If any ITC has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department. 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025(vi) Only such approved ITC shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. (vii) If any ITC was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinizing and approving by the respondent or any other competent authority. (viii) If any of the aforesaid conditions is not complied with by the petitioner, the benefit granted under this order will automatically ceased to operate.9. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.06.2025arr7/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025ToThe Superintendent,Chengalpattu Range,Office of the Superintendent of GST,Varadharaja Nagar, Ammanambakkam,Chengalpattu-603 001.8/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,arrW.P.No.20059 of 2025 &W.M.P.No.22618 of 202505.06.20259/9

W.P.No.20059 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 05.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P.No.20059 of 2025 &W.M.P.No.22618 of 2025M/s.AGN Cargo Movers Private Limited,represented by its Director G.Balaji,No.36/43 Bharathiyar Street,Veerapuram, Chengalpattu-603 002.... Petitioner Vs.The Superintendent,Chengalpattu Range,Office of the Superintendent of GST,Varadharaja Nagar, Ammanambakkam,Chengalpattu-603 001.... RespondentPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in Reference Number:ZA330324048153Z, quash the order dated 11.03.2024 passed therein and further direct the respondent to restore and activate the registration of the petitioner in GSTIN/UIN/33AARCA9067F1ZD.1/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.SudakarFor Respondent : Mr.S.Gurumoorthy Senior Standing CounselORDERThe challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 11.03.2024 passed by the respondent, cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner. 2. Mr.S.Gurumoorthy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent.3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is a registered tax payer under the GST enactments and they have been filing the GST returns regularly upto financial year 2022-23, however, due to slowdown in the business of the petitioner, many 2/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025employees left the service of the petitioner, as a result, the Petitioner could not file its returns for the continuous period of 6 months. Consequently, the respondent issued a show cause notice on 05.02.2024, proposing the cancellation of the GST registration for non-filing of returns for a continuous period of six months, and subsequently passing an order of cancellation on 11.03.2024. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the show cause was uploaded in the GST portal, without serving physical copy of the same to the petitioner, the petitioner was not aware of the same and hence could not file its reply, which resulted in passing of the impugned order. Thereafter, with a view to restart the business, the petitioner has filed the monthly returns upto the date of cancellation of the GST registration. However, since the GST registration was cancelled the petitioner is unable to restart its business. That apart the time limit for filing an application for revocation of cancellation and for filing appeal have also expired. He therefore prays to set aside the impugned order and direct the respondent to restore and activate the GST registration of the petitioner. 3/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025 5. On the other hand, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner did not file returns for a continuous period of six months, which led to the passing of the impugned order. He further submitted that the revocation of the cancellation of registration will be considered only upon payment of all dues and filing of all returns. 6. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 7. Admittedly, the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled due to non-compliance in filing returns. Furthermore, the time limit for filing an application for revocation of the cancellation and also for filing statutory appeal against the cancellation order had also expired, and the petitioner stated that due to slowdown in the business of the Petitioner, they could not pay GST dues and file the returns. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the reason provided by the petitioner for 4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025non-compliance with the relevant provisions of the Act within the stipulated time appears to be genuine. 8. In view of the above, restoration of the GST registration is subject to and conditional upon fulfilling the following conditions : (i) The impugned order dated 11.03.2024 is set aside subject to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the Principal Government Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital, Account No.7883022723, IFSC Code: IDIB000M157, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount.(ii) Upon production of proof with regard to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- as stated above, the respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow the petitioner to file the returns and 5/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025to pay the tax/penalty/fine, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (iii) The petitioner is directed to file returns for the period till date, if not filed, together with tax dues along with interest thereon and the fee fixed for belated filing of returns within a period of 4 weeks from the date of restoration of GST Registration of the petitioner.(iv) It is made clear that such payment of tax, interest, fine/fee etc., shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit (ITC) which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of the petitioner. (v) If any ITC has remained unutilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or competent officer of the Department. 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025(vi) Only such approved ITC shall be allowed to be utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rules. (vii) If any ITC was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinizing and approving by the respondent or any other competent authority. (viii) If any of the aforesaid conditions is not complied with by the petitioner, the benefit granted under this order will automatically ceased to operate.9. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.06.2025arr7/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025ToThe Superintendent,Chengalpattu Range,Office of the Superintendent of GST,Varadharaja Nagar, Ammanambakkam,Chengalpattu-603 001.8/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20059 of 2025KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,arrW.P.No.20059 of 2025 &W.M.P.No.22618 of 202505.06.20259/9

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments