✦ Madras High Court

T.GnanaprakashamS/o. Tamilmani v. The Inspector Of PoliceKamanaickenpalayam Police Station

Case at a glance

Judgment

CRL OP No. 13771 of 2026__________Page1 of 6IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-05-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQCRL OP No. 13771 of 2026T.GnanaprakashamS/o. Tamilmani,1/467, Pannai Thottam, Chinniyagoundan Palayam, Tiruppur-641664...Petitioner(s)VsThe Inspector Of PoliceKamanaickenpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur District.(Crime No. 334/2025)..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, 2023, pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 334 of 2025 u/s. 189(2), 329(3), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s):Mr.N.S. TanviFor Respondent(s):Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 329(3), 115(2), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13771 of 2026__________Page2 of 6118(1), 303(2), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023, in Crime No.334 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, seeks indulgence of this Court. He submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 3. The case of the prosecution as put forth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that the defacto complainant had borrowed an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- from A1 and failed to repay the same.4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record and considering that the Co-Accused / A1 has been already granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide Order dated 10.04.2026 in Crl.O.P.No.8184 of 2026, this Court is inclined to grant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13771 of 2026__________Page3 of 6anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13771 of 2026__________Page4 of 6have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 27-05-2026RNANote:1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order on the Official Website of this Court.2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded on Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13771 of 2026__________Page5 of 6To1.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam.2.The Inspector of Police, Kamanaickenpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur District.3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13771 of 2026__________Page6 of 6MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.RNACRL OP No. 13771 of 202627-05-2026

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments