T. Muralidharan v. M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the submission made by the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as 'infructuous'
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Recording the submission made by the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as 'infructuous'. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.15.03.2024Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / No mjsToThe Principal District Judge, Coimbatore .2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014S.SOUNTHAR , J.mjsCRP.No.4796 of…
Judgment
C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 15.03.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHARCRP.No.4796 of 2014T. Muralidharan S/o. Thangappan ... PetitionerVs.
M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.,represented by its Power Agent Mr. M. Sivakumar2. Rajan S/o. Nakanaasari ...RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore made in E.P. No.1 of 2014 dated 09.10.2014.For Petitioner: Mr.P. GunarajFor Respondents: R1 – Not ready in notice R2 – died.ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties settled at Lok Adalat before the Trial Court and hence the prayer in the revision has become infructuous.
Operative part
Recording the submission made by the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as 'infructuous'. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.15.03.2024Index : Yes / NoInternet : Yes / No mjsToThe Principal District Judge, Coimbatore .2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.4796 of 2014S.SOUNTHAR , J.mjsCRP.No.4796 of 201415.03.20243/3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submission made by the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as 'infructuous'
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.