✦ Madras High Court

S.Sithanandam v. Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoPage 3 of 5

P VELMURUGAN2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
P VELMURUGAN

Outcome

Dismissed

The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. 13.02.2024 mfaIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoPage 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17889 of 2018 To1 The Secretary to Government (Revenue), Govt. of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.2 The District Collector, Revenue…

Judgment

W.P.No.17889 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 13.02.2024CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.No.17889 of 2018S.Sithanandam ... PetitionerVs.1 The Secretary to Government (Revenue), Govt. of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry2 The District Collector, Revenue Department, Puducherry ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration, Declaring the Land Acquisition proceedings in respect of the (1) R.S.No. 75 cadastre No. 914 to the extent of 00.37.00 Hectres (2) R.S.No. 79/3 Cadastre No. 912 to the extent of 00.11.00 Hectres and (3) R.S.No. 79/ 2 Cadastre No. 912 to the extent of 1.05.00 Hectres situated in Karuvadikuppam Revenue Village Oulgaret Municipality Puducherry without Notification as contemplated in the Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17889 of 2018 Rehabilitation and Re-Settlement Act 2013 is null and void or alternative to pay the compensation in accordance with the above said Act 2013 For Petitioner : Mr.P.SureshFor Respondents : Mrs.V.Usha Additional Government Pleader Pondicherry

O R D E RThis Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writof Declaration, Declaring the Land Acquisition proceedings in respect of the (1) R.S.No. 75 cadastre No. 914 to the extent of 00.37.00 Hectres (2) R.S.No. 79/3 Cadastre No. 912 to the extent of 00.11.00 Hectres and (3) R.S.No. 79/ 2 Cadastre No. 912 to the extent of 1.05.00 Hectres situated in Karuvadikuppam Revenue Village Oulgaret Municipality Puducherry without Notification as contemplated in the Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Re-Settlement Act 2013 is null and void or alternative, to pay the compensation in accordance with the above said Act 2013.

2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader (Pondicherry) appearing for the Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17889 of 2018 official respondents and perused the materials available on record.

3.

The petitioner has impleaded neither the acquisitioning body nor requisitioning body. The petitioner has made all the representation only before the Revenue officials and not to acquisition body or requisition body. The relief sought for by the petitioner in the writ petition against the respondents is not maintainable.

Operative part

4.

The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. 13.02.2024 mfaIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking Order: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/NoPage 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17889 of 2018 To1 The Secretary to Government (Revenue), Govt. of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.2 The District Collector, Revenue Department, Puducherry. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17889 of 2018 P.VELMURUGAN, J.mfaW.P.No.17889 of 201813.02.2024Page 5 of 5

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Re-Settlement Act, 2013.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments