✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

A A NAKKIRAN

Case at a glance

Bench
A A NAKKIRAN

Outcome

Allowed

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application and in view of no objection submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents, this application is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application and in view of no objection submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents, this application is allowed.

Judgment

A.No.3268 of 2024in C.S.No.436 of 2017A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.This application has been filed to condone the delay of 1206 days of the defendants 3 and 4 in filing the ex parte order dated 04.02.2021 and to set aside the ex parte order dated 04.02.2021 in the above suit.

2.

Heard both sides.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in allowing this application.

Operative part

4.

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application and in view of no objection submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents, this application is allowed.

5.

Post the matter on 22.08.2024.Gv 14.08.2024A.A.NAKKIRAN, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis gvA.No.3268 of 2024in C.S.No.436 of 201714.08.2024

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments