2009&M.P.No.1 of 2009 Billgates college of Education,Run by Sri. Venkateswara Educational Trust v. The Registrar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the submissions made by the learned counselsappearing on either side, the respondent is directed to disposeof the representation, dated 06.07.2009, on merits and inaccordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE: 20.07.2009CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENWrit Petition No.13338 of 2009&M.P.No.1 of 2009 Billgates college of Education, Run by Sri. Venkateswara Educational Trust, Rep. By its Chairman and Correspondent, Gengavaram, Kanakkankuppuam P.O.Gingee Taluk, Villupuram...PetitionerVersusThe Registrar, Tamil Nadu Teacher Education University, Kamarajar Salar, Chennai – 600 005. ...RespondentWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondentherein to dispose of the representations made by the petitioneron 5.1.2009 and 6.7.2009.For Petitioner : Mr.S.UdayakumarFor Respondent : Mr.K.H.Ravi kumar Government AdvocateO R D E RHeard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.
This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to dispose of therepresentations made by the petitioner, on 05.01.2009 and06.07.2009.
At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, thelearned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner hassubmitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directedto dispose of the representation, dated 06.07.2009, on merits https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and in accordance with law, within a specified period.
The learned Government Advocate appearing behalf of therespondent, has no objection for such an order being passed bythis Court.
Operative part
In view of the submissions made by the learned counselsappearing on either side, the respondent is directed to disposeof the representation, dated 06.07.2009, on merits and inaccordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed tofurnish a copy of the representation, dated 06.07.2009, to therespondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is madeclear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed anyopinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Nocosts. Consequently connected M.P. is closed. Sd/Asst. Registrar/true copy/Sub Asst. Registrararr/smsToThe Registrar, Tamil Nadu Teacher Education University, Kamarajar Salar, Chennai – 600 005.1 cc To Mr.S.Udayakumar, Advocate, SR.32707Writ Petition No.13338 of 2009ntk(co)pmk.21.7.2009.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.